HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › PeopleInsight · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

PeopleInsight

6Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PeopleInsight was named 3 times in People analytics and 1 other category, where HiBob led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business26 of 96

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 99

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PeopleInsight for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	2%	16 of 99	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15%
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	49 of 89	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PeopleInsight yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PeopleInsight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Purpose-built platforms like PeopleInsight offer the best balance of functionality and accessibility for mid-sized companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · People analytics · budget prompt · first choice

“Need deeper analytics and can stretch budget: tools like PeopleInsight are more mid-market/enterprise-oriented” GPT-5.4 mini · People analytics · budget prompt · alternative

“Mid-Market Specialized (Best Fit): Solutions like ChartHop, Divalent, or PeopleInsight.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce planning · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PeopleInsight, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleInsight was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BambooHR4 of 61Not in the top three

ChartHop3 of 61Not in the top three

Crunchr3 of 60Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI2 of 60Not in the top three

Visier2 of 60Not in the top three

Factorial1 of 61Not in the top three

PeopleForce1 of 61Not in the top three

Peoplelogic1 of 61Not in the top three

Rippling1 of 61Not in the top three

15Five1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PeopleInsight. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named PeopleInsight and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com3

g2.com2

hr.university2

hrpaypick.com2

peoplemanagingpeople.com2

personio.com2

toolkit.ctbzai.com2

assets.ctfassets.net1

basedash.com1

crunchr.com1

Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming PeopleInsight came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/analytics-tools3

g2.com/products/peopleinsight/pricing2

hr.university/tools/hr-analytics-software2

hrpaypick.com/hr-analytics-software-small-business2

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-people-analytics-software2

personio.com/hr-lexicon/hr-analytics-tools2

toolkit.ctbzai.com/articles/best-hr-analytics-software-20262

assets.ctfassets.net/lbgy40h4xfb7/4e7P5juZ9LJXoAg9vYHtiW/5f99f5f4a1471e410187d948d6c9515f/1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PeopleInsight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PeopleInsight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at peopleinsight.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.