HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Salary Equity Analyzer · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Salary Equity Analyzer

3Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Salary Equity Analyzer was named 2 times in Pay equity, where Syndio led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business52 of 84

under the label threshold

Mid-market9 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Salary Equity Analyzer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	5%	9 of 60	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Salary Equity Analyzer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Salary Equity Analyzer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the Vermont Women's Fund toolkit or Salary Equity Analyzer can give you solid baseline insights at zero cost” Kimi K2 · Pay equity · budget prompt · first choice

“Start here if ultra-limited budget: Pave Lite or ALENA REVA—zero cost, immediate value.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Pay equity · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salary Equity Analyzer, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salary Equity Analyzer was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Payscale2 of 31Not in the top three

Gusto2 of 30Not in the top three

PayAnalytics2 of 30Not in the top three

ADP DataCloud1 of 30Not in the top three

BambooHR1 of 30Not in the top three

ChartHop1 of 30Not in the top three

Compease1 of 30Not in the top three

Deel1 of 30Not in the top three

Deel Compensation/Pay Equity1 of 30Not in the top three

Excel/Google Sheets templates1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salary Equity Analyzer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Salary Equity Analyzer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

alenareva.com3

gartner.com3

guideflow.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

soteriahr.com3

sourceforge.net3

trustradius.com3

us.fitgap.com3

compensationtools.net2

hr.software2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Salary Equity Analyzer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

alenareva.com/vibe-coding/salary-equity-analyzer3

gartner.com/reviews/market/pay-equity-software3

guideflow.com/blog/pay-equity-software3

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-pay-equity-software3

soteriahr.com/pay-equity-analysis-software3

trustradius.com/pay-equity3

compensationtools.net/best-pay-equity-software2

payanalytics.com/2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Salary Equity Analyzer

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salary Equity Analyzer; a claim can dispute any of them.

ALENA REVA Salary Equity Analyzer 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salary Equity Analyzer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salary Equity Analyzer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salary.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.