HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Talentify · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Talentify

5Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Talentify was named 4 times in Job advertising, where JobTarget led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market103 of 109

under the label threshold

Enterprise61 of 70

under the label threshold

In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Talentify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	0%	103 of 109	75%	4	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Talentify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Talentify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“These platforms allegedly harvest your personal information without legitimate job opportunities” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

“starts around $5K/month and goes up to $25K/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · budget prompt · hard negative

“Some platforms offer free trials (like Talentify starting at $5K/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · Job advertising · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Talentify, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Talentify was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Appcast4 of 53Not in the top three

Adway2 of 50Not in the top three

DE Amplify2 of 50Not in the top three

Indeed2 of 50Not in the top three

Joveo2 of 50Not in the top three

LinkedIn2 of 50Not in the top three

Talroo2 of 50Not in the top three

JobTarget1 of 51Not in the top three

CareerBuilder1 of 50Not in the top three

Cyber Focus AI1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Talentify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Talentify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

guideflow.com4

selectsoftwarereviews.com4

jobcopilot.com3

joveo.com3

softwarefinder.com3

worldmetrics.org3

directemployers.org2

reddit.com2

us.fitgap.com2

Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Talentify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/programmatic-job-advertising-software4

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/programmatic-job-advertising-software4

jobcopilot.com/programmatic-job-ad-platforms-compared3

softwarefinder.com/resources/programmatic-recruitment-software3

worldmetrics.org/best/programmatic-job-advertising-software3

directemployers.org/programmatic-job-advertising2

g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-highest-rated-programmatic-job-advertising-platforms-for-c2

g2.com/discussions/which-programmatic-job-advertising-platforms-have-the-strongest-optimiz2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Talentify

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Talentify; a claim can dispute any of them.

Talentify.io 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Talentify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Talentify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at talen.to is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.