HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Time Off Manager 365 · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Time Off Manager 365

14Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Time Off Manager 365 was named 5 times in Leave, where BambooHR led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In leave · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Time Off Manager 365 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Leave and absence managementCore HR and payroll2%10 of 890%5under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Time Off Manager 365 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Time Off Manager 365 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels2
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Time Off Manager 365 - Best for Microsoft SMBs, with native integration with Microsoft 365” Llama 4 Maverick · Leave · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Stands out in 2026 with AI-powered leave forecasting, deep Microsoft 365 integration, and affordable pricing for growing businesses.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Leave · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your company uses Microsoft 365, Time Off Manager 365 is a cost-effective and well-reviewed option.” Mistral Small · Leave · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“if your company already uses Microsoft 365 tools, Time Off Manager 365 would integrate seamlessly” MiniMax M2.5 · Leave · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Time Off Manager 365, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Time Off Manager 365 was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BambooHR5 of 141Not in the top three
AbsenceSoft4 of 140Not in the top three
Timetastic4 of 140Not in the top three
Workday4 of 140Not in the top three
Dayforce3 of 141Not in the top three
Gusto3 of 141Not in the top three
Vacation Tracker3 of 141Not in the top three
Buddy Punch3 of 140Not in the top three
LeaveBoard3 of 140Not in the top three
UKG Pro3 of 140Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Time Off Manager 365. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 14 answers that named Time Off Manager 365 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apps365.com12
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
flamingoapp.com6
employsome.com5
blog.purelyhr.com4
buddypunch.com4
connecteam.com4
forbes.com4
absencesoft.com3
attendancebot.com3

Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Time Off Manager 365 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Time Off Manager 365's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Time Off Manager 365, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at timeoff.management is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack