HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Verint/Calabrio · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Verint/Calabrio

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Verint/Calabrio was named 1 time in Workforce management sui, where ADP Workforce Now led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market76 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprise58 of 82

under the label threshold

In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Verint/Calabrio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	76 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Verint/Calabrio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Verint/Calabrio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Verint/Calabrio, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Verint/Calabrio was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dayforce2 of 20Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM2 of 20Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors2 of 20Not in the top three

WorkForce Software2 of 20Not in the top three

ADP WorkForce Suite1 of 20Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now1 of 20Not in the top three

Aspect WFM1 of 20Not in the top three

Connecteam1 of 20Not in the top three

Deputy1 of 20Not in the top three

Genesys Cloud Workforce Engagement1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Verint/Calabrio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Verint/Calabrio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com2

gitnux.org2

guideflow.com2

viewpointanalysis.com2

worldmetrics.org2

assembled.com1

bestdevops.com1

cloudtalk.io1

contactcenternation.com1

cxfoundation.com1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Verint/Calabrio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/amp/tools/10-best-workforce-management-software-for-enter2

gitnux.org/best/wfm-software2

viewpointanalysis.com/post/workforce-management-software-options-20262

worldmetrics.org/best/wfm-software2

assembled.com/page/best-workforce-management-software1

bestdevops.com/top-10-workforce-management-software-scheduling-compliance-performance1

cloudtalk.io/blog/best-contact-center-workforce-management-software-based-on-g21

contactcenternation.com/contact-center-workforce-management1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Verint/Calabrio

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Verint/Calabrio; a claim can dispute any of them.

Verint + Calabrio 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Verint/Calabrio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Verint/Calabrio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at verint.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.