HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › ADP WorkForce Suite · September 2026 Edition

ADP · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

ADP WorkForce Suite

15Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ADP WorkForce Suite was named 2 times in Workforce management sui and 1 other category, where ADP Workforce Now led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market32 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprise8 of 82

under the label threshold

In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ADP WorkForce Suite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	32 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	58 of 94	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ADP WorkForce Suite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ADP WorkForce Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels2

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ADP WorkForce Suite accommodates unique pay rules, labor regulations, and complex scheduling across global operations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ADP WorkForce Suite, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ADP WorkForce Suite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dayforce8 of 153Not in the top three

UKG Pro7 of 154Not in the top three

Workday Workforce Management7 of 151Not in the top three

UKG Pro Workforce Management6 of 153Not in the top three

Workday5 of 150Not in the top three

Deputy4 of 150Not in the top three

Quinyx4 of 150Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM3 of 150Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors3 of 150Not in the top three

Shiftboard3 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ADP WorkForce Suite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named ADP WorkForce Suite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com10

peoplemanagingpeople.com9

learn.g2.com8

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com7

worldmetrics.org6

workforcesoftware.com5

g2.com4

getapp.com4

hr.software4

infotech.com4

Sixty-one of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming ADP WorkForce Suite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/amp/tools/10-best-workforce-management-software-for-enter7

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-enterprise-workforce-management-software6

guideflow.com/blog/workforce-scheduling-software5

learn.g2.com/employee-scheduling-tools5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-enterprise-employee-scheduling-software5

guideflow.com/blog/workforce-management-software4

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-workforce-management-software4

viewpointanalysis.com/post/workforce-management-software-options-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ADP WorkForce Suite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ADP WorkForce Suite; a claim can dispute any of them.

ADP Workforce Suite 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ADP WorkForce Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ADP WorkForce Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.