HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Quinyx · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Quinyx

23Judge labels

3First choices

3Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Quinyx was named 3 times in Workforce management sui and 1 other category, where ADP Workforce Now led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market28 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 82

under the label threshold

In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quinyx for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	28 of 95	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	0%	56 of 90	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quinyx yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quinyx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Quinyx: Strong for global manufacturing and retail.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quinyx, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quinyx was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

UKG Pro11 of 234Not in the top three

Workday8 of 230Not in the top three

BambooHR7 of 231Not in the top three

Dayforce7 of 231Not in the top three

Homebase6 of 235Not in the top three

Workday Workforce Management5 of 231Not in the top three

7shifts5 of 230Not in the top three

Connecteam5 of 230Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors5 of 230Not in the top three

ADP WorkForce Suite4 of 231Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quinyx. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Quinyx and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com13

learn.g2.com12

guideflow.com11

worldmetrics.org10

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com8

g2.com8

selectsoftwarereviews.com7

nowsta.com6

rippling.com6

softwareadvice.com6

Eighty-seven of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming Quinyx came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/amp/tools/10-best-workforce-management-software-for-enter8

worldmetrics.org/best/enterprise-workforce-management-software7

learn.g2.com/best-workforce-management-software6

guideflow.com/blog/workforce-management-software5

joinhomebase.com/blog/workforce-planning-tools5

thrivea.com/blog/best-workforce-planning-tools-for-small-businesses5

learn.g2.com/best-workforce-planning-software4

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-enterprise-workforce-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quinyx's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quinyx, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quinyx.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.