Every category where a model named WorkForce Software for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	25 of 95	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WorkForce Software yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WorkForce Software across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“WorkForce Suite is best for complex, large-scale scheduling.” Mistral Small · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Lower user ratings vs. leaders (7.7 composite)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WorkForce Software, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkForce Software was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dayforce18 of 254Not in the top three

UKG Pro14 of 257Not in the top three

Workday11 of 252Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors10 of 251Not in the top three

Rippling7 of 250Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now6 of 250Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM5 of 250Not in the top three

Connecteam4 of 250Not in the top three

Infor Workforce Management4 of 250Not in the top three

Oracle Workforce Management4 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkForce Software. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 25 answers that named WorkForce Software and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com15

peoplemanagingpeople.com13

viewpointanalysis.com12

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com11

worldmetrics.org11

gitnux.org8

learn.g2.com8

firsthr.app7

gartner.com7

rippling.com7

Ninety-nine of the ninety-nine domain citations in answers naming WorkForce Software came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/workforce-management-software14

viewpointanalysis.com/post/workforce-management-software-options-202612

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/amp/tools/10-best-workforce-management-software-for-enter10

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-workforce-management-software8

firsthr.app/compare/core-hr/workforce-management-software7

learn.g2.com/best-workforce-management-software7

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-enterprise-workforce-management-software7

gitnux.org/best/wfm-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as WorkForce Software

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WorkForce Software; a claim can dispute any of them.

WorkForce Software (WorkForce Suite) 1WorkForce Suite (WorkForce Software) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkForce Software's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkForce Software, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workforce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.