HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Infor Workforce Management · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Infor Workforce Management

13Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Infor Workforce Management was named 3 times in Workforce management sui, where ADP Workforce Now led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business49 of 70

under the label threshold

Mid-market94 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprise64 of 82

under the label threshold

In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Infor Workforce Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	94 of 95	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Infor Workforce Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Infor Workforce Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“On G2, it holds a rating of 3.7/5.0 with only 14 reviews... suggests the product may not be widely used or is struggling to retain customers” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative

“payroll platforms that happen to have WFM/scheduling modules tacked on... incredibly complex to configure” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · soft negative

“Lowest ratings in some reviews (5.8 composite)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Infor Workforce Management, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Infor Workforce Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dayforce8 of 132Not in the top three

UKG Pro6 of 133Not in the top three

Aspect WFM4 of 130Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors4 of 130Not in the top three

WorkForce Software4 of 130Not in the top three

Workday4 of 130Not in the top three

Deputy3 of 131Not in the top three

Verint Workforce Management3 of 131Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now3 of 130Not in the top three

Blue Yonder Workforce Management3 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Infor Workforce Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 13 answers that named Infor Workforce Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com8

g2.com5

assembled.com4

gitnux.org4

guideflow.com4

performancereviewssoftware.com4

worldmetrics.org4

infotech.com3

learn.g2.com3

linkedin.com3

Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Infor Workforce Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/workforce-management-applications4

performancereviewssoftware.com/blog/best-workforce-management-software-compared4

assembled.com/blog/beyond-the-rfp-11-things-most-wfm-vendors-dont-want-you-to-double-click3

assembled.com/page/best-workforce-management-software3

g2.com/products/infor-workforce-management-wfm/reviews3

guideflow.com/blog/workforce-management-software3

infotech.com/software-reviews/categories/workforce-management-enterprise3

theshopworks.com/blog/workforce-management/the-10-biggest-issues-when-implementing-wfm-sof3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Infor Workforce Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Infor Workforce Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Infor WFM 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Infor Workforce Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Infor Workforce Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at infor.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.