Every category where a model named WageWorks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
HSA and FSA administrators	Compensation and total rewards	0%	107 of 111	43%	7	under 10 labels · led by HealthEquity at 29%
Financial wellness platforms	Compensation and total rewards	0%	68 of 117	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by LearnLux at 24%
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts	Compensation and total rewards	0%	70 of 90	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Compt at 40%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WageWorks yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WageWorks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative12 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best for Existing Benefits Admins ... you likely already have access to some of their financial tools for little to no extra cost” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial wellness · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“HealthEquity / WageWorks ⚠️ HIGH CAUTION - Major data breach (March 2024)” Kimi K2 · HSA & FSA admin · negative prompt · hard negative

“Extreme hold times (hours), fax errors, poor phone system.” Grok 4.1 Fast · HSA & FSA admin · negative prompt · hard negative

“Be especially careful about plan-specific fees.” GPT-6 Luna · HSA & FSA admin · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WageWorks, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WageWorks was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HealthEquity22 of 265Not among the top eight

HSA Bank11 of 260Not among the top eight

Fidelity HSA9 of 261Not among the top eight

Lively8 of 261Not among the top eight

WEX Benefits8 of 261Not among the top eight

Navia Benefit Solutions7 of 260Not among the top eight

Bank of America4 of 260Not among the top eight

Discovery Benefits4 of 260Not among the top eight

PayFlex4 of 260Not among the top eight

Alegeus3 of 262Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WageWorks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 26 answers that named WageWorks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrtechsaas.com9

trustpilot.com9

bbb.org8

getbenepass.com7

claritybenefitsolutions.com6

gitnux.org6

healthequity.com6

wifitalents.com6

consumeraffairs.com5

linkedin.com5

Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming WageWorks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-fsa-hsa-administrators-mid-market-employers9

getbenepass.com/blog/fsa-providers7

bbb.org/us/ut/draper/profile/health-savings-administrators/healthequity-inc-1126-22234692/6

consumeraffairs.com/business/wageworks.html5

trustpilot.com/review/www.wageworks.com5

bbb.org/us/ut/draper/profile/health-savings-administrators/healthequity-inc-1166-22234692/4

ca.trustpilot.com/review/healthequity.com4

claritybenefitsolutions.com/resources/clarity-news/fsa-vs-hsa-vs-hra-administrator-compari4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

wageworks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WageWorks takes 0% of first choices and HealthEquity takes 29%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “hsa and fsa administrator”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “hsa and fsa administrators”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 90,500 a month (“wageworks”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 569 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 103,008 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6,131 · 478 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,326
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 107 of 111 in HSA & FSA admin

Segment leader

29%

HealthEquity

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 26 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on wageworks.com

505

subdomains included

Content

277

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Blog	225	undated	Benefits administration
News or press	31	undated	Benefits administration
Glossary or explainer	9	undated
Case study	4	undated
Report or ebook	3	undated
Template or tool	3	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Comparison	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page wageworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as WageWorks

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WageWorks; a claim can dispute any of them.

HealthEquity/WageWorks 2HealthEquity / WageWorks 1Wageworks 1

Follow WageWorks

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

WageWorks is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: EZ Receipts is for managing your account after setup and activation are complete.
wageworks.com
For: Individuals
wageworks.com
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What WageWorks's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: wageworks.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WageWorks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WageWorks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WageWorks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where WageWorks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name WageWorks, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.