Every category where a model named Zoho Learn for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning management systems	Learning and development	2%	8 of 74	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	21 of 80	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	93 of 116	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	65 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zoho Learn yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zoho Learn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained26 labels3

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with TalentLMS or Zoho Learn as they offer the best balance of features and affordability” MiniMax M2.5 · Learning management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“Free for 5 users/1 portal; paid from $1/user/month | Affordable scaling, good integration” Grok 4.1 Fast · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · alternative

“Zoho Learn (5 users free) – affordable, integrates with Zoho ecosystem” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Learning management syst · budget prompt · alternative

“If you have 10\u2013100 employees and a strict budget: Go with Zoho Learn” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited coaching features (no live 1:1 coaching, no AI coach)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho Learn, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Learn was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentLMS36 of 4426Not in the top three

GoSkills21 of 446Not in the top three

Moodle21 of 443Not in the top three

Connecteam20 of 441Not in the top three

iSpring Learn16 of 440Not in the top three

Trainual11 of 442Not in the top three

360Learning10 of 440Not in the top three

Canvas LMS10 of 440Not in the top three

Docebo8 of 440Not in the top three

Google Classroom8 of 440Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Learn. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 44 answers that named Zoho Learn and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com29

capterra.com27

peoplemanagingpeople.com20

talentlms.com16

digitalhill.com14

forbes.com14

g2.com14

hrkonnect.com14

learn.g2.com13

group.app12

173 of the 173 domain citations in answers naming Zoho Learn came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

capterra.com/resources/best-lms-for-small-business25

goskills.com/resources/affordable-lms20

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-lms-for-small-business19

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-small-business16

digitalhill.com/blog/best-affordable-lms-small-business-202614

forbes.com/advisor/business/the-best-learning-management-systems14

hrkonnect.com/feeds/blog/small-business-learning-management-system11

group.app/blog/lms-for-small-business10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Learn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Learn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoholearn.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.