Coaching platforms · October 2026 Edition
Growthspace vs 15Five
Three of fourteen models named Growthspace first on the direct prompt; two named 15Five. Growthspace was named by twelve of the fourteen models and 15Five by nine and Growthspace carries 23 labels and 15Five 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in ten categories this edition.
First-choice share20%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2311A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Growthspace reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Growthspace vs Exec · Growthspace vs Torch · Growthspace vs Lattice
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the coaching platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GrowthspaceFirst choices, of fourteen models15Five
Direct32
Paraphrase801 against Growthspace
Comparative00
Budget-constrained03
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Growthspace and 15Five stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Growthspace 15Five first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Growthspace on the left and 15Five on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Growthspace and 15Five stood in it.
Growthspace first, 15Five not the choice
3 of 14 models15Five was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashGrowthspace, Jiminny alternatives: Avoma, Boon Health, Cloverleaf
Mistral SmallGrowthspace alternatives: Coachello, Motivosity
DeepSeek V4 FlashGrowthspace, Lattice alternatives: Betterworks
15Five first, Growthspace an alternative
2 of 14 modelsGrowthspace was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Kimi K215Five, Lattice alternatives: Betterworks, CoachHub, Growthspace
GPT-6 Luna15Five alternatives: BetterUp, Gong, Mindtickle, Torch
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Boon Health, Torch alternatives: Avoma, Coachello, Gong, Growthspace, Risely, Sounding Board
Grok 4.1 FastLattice alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, CoachHub, Jiminny, Leapsome, Showpad Coach
Llama 4 MaverickTorch alternatives: Growthspace, Lattice, Motivosity
Qwen 3.7 FlashLattice alternatives: Growthspace, Motivosity
GLM 4.7 FlashXBetterUp alternatives: CoachHub, Growthspace
MiniMax M2.5no first choice alternatives: BetterUp, CoachHub, Growthspace
Muse Glimmer 30BTorch alternatives: Boon Health, Exec, Growthspace
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniLattice alternatives: CoachHub, Culture Amp, Torch, Valence
Perplexity SonarTorch alternatives: Betterworks, Cloverleaf, Lattice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
15Five leads by eleven points.
15Five11%#1 of 10Growthspace0%#– of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Growthspace leads at mid-market.
Growthspace20%#1 of 1315Five9%#4 of 13Enterprise
What the models said about Growthspace
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Strong reviews (4.8/5 across 249 reviews) but more enterprise-oriented” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“If you want a dedicated coaching platform: Go with Growthspace. It's the highest-rated coaching-specific platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“two primary platforms depending on your specific organizational goals: Growthspace and Exec.com” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the top digital coaching marketplaces for a mid-sized B2B company are Growthspace and Exec.com” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about 15Five
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Winner: 15Five 15Five is widely considered the gold standard for affordable, user-friendly continuous coaching.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with 15Five given its extremely low starting price of $4/user/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Growthspace vs ExecGrowthspace vs TorchGrowthspace vs LatticeGrowthspace vs Boon HealthGrowthspace vs Simply.CoachGrowthspace vs CoachHubExec vs 15FiveTorch vs 15Five15Five vs Lattice15Five vs Boon Health15Five vs Simply.Coach15Five vs CoachHubAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full coaching platforms standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.