HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Growthspace · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Growthspace

68Judge labels
14First choices
2Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
26% in Coaching platforms for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 116 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 28 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Growthspace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Coaching platformsLearning and development26%1 of 1164%28accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Growthspace yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Growthspace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash20002
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.1 Fast11002
Mistral Small20002
DeepSeek V4 Flash21104
Llama 4 Maverick11002
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K220204
GLM 4.7 FlashX11114
MiniMax M2.520002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels5
Paraphrase14 labels8
Comparative19 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Growthspace automates the matching, tracking, and ROI reporting. It has one of the strongest independent G2 review profiles in the coaching space (4.8/5).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · first choice
“I recommend starting with CoachHub or Growthspace for their strong mid-market focus, ROI, and ease of integration.” Mistral Small · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Growthspace as the default choice if your goal is measurable employee development with strong ROI” Perplexity Sonar · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best digital coaching marketplace for a mid-sized B2B company would be Growthspace or Exec.com” Llama 4 Maverick · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Not ideal for very tight budgets, but worth keeping on your radar as your company grows” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Growthspace, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Growthspace was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CoachHub58 of 689Not in the top three
BetterUp54 of 6819Not in the top three
Torch45 of 680Not in the top three
EZRA29 of 680Not in the top three
Risely27 of 685Not in the top three
Valence22 of 680Not in the top three
Coachello15 of 682Not in the top three
Bravely11 of 681Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Growthspace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 68 answers that named Growthspace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com53
coachstackhub.ai36
torch.io29
coachello.ai27
exec.com22
easygenerator.com21
g2.com18
coachhub.com17
coachilly.com17
zendikt.com17

257 of the 257 domain citations in answers naming Growthspace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Growthspace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Growthspace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at growthspace.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack