HR AI Index
Index Vendors › BetterUp · September 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

BetterUp

138Judge labels
23First choices
57Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
5Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
49% in Coaching platforms for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 116 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 55% of its 38 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BetterUp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Coaching platformsLearning and development2%16 of 11655%38criticized challenger
360 feedbackPerformance and talent management0%28 of 770%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40%
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience0%57 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%
Mentoring softwareLearning and development0%24 of 550%1under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%76 of 1620%1under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BetterUp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BetterUp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510012
GPT-5.4 mini02013
Gemini 3.5 Flash10034
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00246
Mistral Small00303
DeepSeek V4 Flash01045
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash21115
Kimi K210135
GLM 4.7 FlashX00325
MiniMax M2.501023

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct28 labels8
Paraphrase23 labels11
Comparative28 labels13not counted in share
Budget-constrained26 labels3
Scale-constrained15 labels1
Negative18 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative138 labels in all, every segment counted; 23 of the 37 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Better Alternatives: Use directories specifically designed for professional coaching, such as ICF Credential Registry, BetterUp, or iCoachWorld.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose BetterUp if: You need the largest coach network and want a proven, research-backed platform for broad workforce development.” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · first choice
“As the pioneer of the digital enterprise coaching space, BetterUp has the largest global network of vetted human coaches.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · first choice
“BetterUp is the category pioneer with the widest coach network and deepest behavioral-science research” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid per-seat enterprise platforms — BetterUp ($500–$2,000/seat/year) ... charge for every employee whether they use it or not” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid per-seat pricing from larger platforms (BetterUp, CoachHub) as they can be prohibitively expensive” MiniMax M2.5 · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid premium platforms like BetterUp ($300-$1,000+ per employee) unless absolutely necessary” MiniMax M2.5 · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · hard negative
“Trustpilot: ~2.1/5, fraud claims (unexpected invoices/subscriptions), poor contractor pay/comms.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BetterUp, over the 138 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BetterUp was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CoachHub115 of 1387Not in the top three
Boon Health59 of 13816Not in the top three
Torch57 of 1383Not in the top three
Growthspace54 of 13810Not in the top three
Exec53 of 1386Not in the top three
EZRA47 of 1381Not in the top three
Risely43 of 13814Not in the top three
Coachello28 of 1381Not in the top three
Valence28 of 1381Not in the top three
CoachAccountable13 of 1381Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BetterUp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 117 of the 138 answers that named BetterUp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com92
coachello.ai55
coachstackhub.ai55
torch.io45
exec.com41
easygenerator.com37
g2.com35
coachhub.com29
360learning.com28
coachilly.com27

444 of the 444 domain citations in answers naming BetterUp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BetterUp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BetterUp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at betterup.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack