Every category where a model named Torch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	7%	4 of 116	0%	29	accepted challenger
Mentoring software	Learning and development	0%	18 of 55	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	38 of 74	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Torch yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Torch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	1	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	2	2	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	2	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	2	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels1

Paraphrase12 labels2

Comparative22 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained9 labels1

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd generally recommend Torch if your priority is a true coaching marketplace plus enterprise-ready rollout” GPT-5.4 mini · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Torch is a leadership coaching and alignment platform built for mid-market and enterprise talent teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · first choice

“Given you're at 500 people, I'd prioritize Growthspace, Exec.com, Torch, or CoachHub” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · scale prompt · first choice

“Torch is an excellent starting point” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Torch, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Torch was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoachHub59 of 688Not in the top three

BetterUp57 of 6817Not in the top three

Growthspace45 of 6810Not in the top three

Boon Health39 of 6810Not in the top three

Exec38 of 685Not in the top three

EZRA28 of 680Not in the top three

Risely22 of 685Not in the top three

Valence19 of 680Not in the top three

Coachello16 of 681Not in the top three

Sounding Board11 of 680Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Torch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 68 answers that named Torch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com48

coachello.ai31

torch.ioYour site29

coachstackhub.ai27

easygenerator.com18

exec.com16

zendikt.com14

coachilly.com13

thinkific.com12

coachhub.com11

190 of the 219 domain citations in answers naming Torch came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms48

torch.io/compare28

coachstackhub.ai/compare/business-coaching-platforms27

coachello.ai/blog/online-coaching-platform25

easygenerator.com/en/blog/e-learning/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms18

exec.com/learn/best-leadership-coaching-platforms14

zendikt.com/top-10-coaching-software13

coachello.ai/blog/10-best-corporate-coaching-platforms-for-organizational-transformation-i11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Torch

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Torch; a claim can dispute any of them.

Torch (formerly Lessonly) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Torch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Torch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at torch.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.