Every category where a model named Risely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	4%	6 of 116	11%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Risely yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Risely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	3	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels4

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative16 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained22 labels10

Scale-constrained5 labels2

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Rocky.ai or Risely if you want to provide on-demand, automated individual coaching to employees at the lowest possible monthly rate.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice

“For the tightest budgets: Start with Risely's free trial or Boon's usage-based model” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice

“Offers public, tiered pricing ($59/user/month for individual...) It provides AI-augmented coaching at an accessible price point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · alternative

“noteworthy for having transparent, published pricing rather than custom quotes, making it easier to budget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Under ~50 employees: Boon, Risely (lightweight, AI)... one built for startups may not scale to your needs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · scale prompt · soft negative

“Valence/Risely are AI-only, which may be limiting” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Risely, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Risely was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Boon Health49 of 6014Not in the top three

BetterUp43 of 608Not in the top three

CoachHub43 of 606Not in the top three

Exec34 of 603Not in the top three

Growthspace27 of 602Not in the top three

Valence24 of 600Not in the top three

Torch22 of 601Not in the top three

EZRA20 of 600Not in the top three

Coachello18 of 601Not in the top three

Bravely13 of 602Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Risely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 60 answers that named Risely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com54

coachstackhub.ai37

exec.com24

360learning.com23

coachello.ai22

torch.io21

togetherplatform.com20

easygenerator.com19

risely.meYour site18

coachilly.com17

237 of the 255 domain citations in answers naming Risely came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms53

coachstackhub.ai/compare/business-coaching-platforms37

exec.com/learn/best-leadership-coaching-platforms23

360learning.com/blog/online-coaching-platforms22

coachello.ai/blog/online-coaching-platform19

easygenerator.com/en/blog/e-learning/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms19

togetherplatform.com/blog/best-online-platforms-for-employee-coaching19

torch.io/compare19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Risely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Risely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at risely.me is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.