Every category where a model named EZRA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	85 of 116	43%	7	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	57 of 84	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EZRA yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EZRA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labelsNone

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options to consider are Together, Risely, Rocky.ai, EZRA, Sounding Board, Imperative, and Bravely.” Llama 4 Maverick · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · alternative

“Choose EZRA if: You want simplicity, speed of implementation, and unlimited coaching sessions.” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“EZRA is noted for unlimited-session style offerings.” GPT-5.4 mini · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms to Avoid for Mid-Market ... Better suited for large enterprises” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid ... EZRA: Better suited for large enterprises” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · hard negative

“platforms like BetterUp and EZRA are generally more enterprise-oriented and not the cheapest path” GPT-5.4 mini · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EZRA, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EZRA was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BetterUp47 of 5018Not in the top three

CoachHub45 of 5011Not in the top three

Growthspace29 of 502Not in the top three

Torch28 of 500Not in the top three

Boon Health26 of 503Not in the top three

Exec26 of 503Not in the top three

Risely20 of 506Not in the top three

Coachello16 of 501Not in the top three

Valence15 of 500Not in the top three

Sounding Board12 of 500Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EZRA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 50 answers that named EZRA and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com38

coachello.ai27

easygenerator.com24

torch.io22

exec.com20

coachstackhub.ai18

g2.com17

thinkific.com14

coachhub.com11

coachilly.com11

202 of the 202 domain citations in answers naming EZRA came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms38

coachello.ai/blog/online-coaching-platform27

easygenerator.com/en/blog/e-learning/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms24

torch.io/compare22

coachstackhub.ai/compare/business-coaching-platforms17

exec.com/learn/best-leadership-coaching-platforms17

thinkific.com/blog/enterprise-coaching-platforms11

coachhub.com/10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as EZRA

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EZRA; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ezra 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EZRA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EZRA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ezrarecruiting.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.