HR AI Index
Index Vendors › CoachHub · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

CoachHub

131Judge labels
18First choices
39Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
26% in Coaching platforms for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 116 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 38 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CoachHub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Coaching platformsLearning and development6%5 of 11629%38criticized challenger
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience0%58 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%
Mentoring softwareLearning and development0%25 of 550%1under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoachHub yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoachHub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501012
GPT-5.4 mini03003
Gemini 3.5 Flash02024
Perplexity Sonar02002
Grok 4.1 Fast00235
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash22015
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02103
Kimi K203115
GLM 4.7 FlashX02316
MiniMax M2.500123

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels5
Paraphrase33 labels11
Comparative25 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained21 labels1
Scale-constrained14 labels1
Negative14 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative131 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I recommend starting with CoachHub or Growthspace for their strong mid-market focus, ROI, and ease of integration.” Mistral Small · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with CoachHub as your primary choice for a mid-sized B2B company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Given you're at 500 people, I'd prioritize Growthspace, Exec.com, Torch, or CoachHub” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose CoachHub if: You're a multinational needing coaching across multiple languages and regions, especially in EMEA.” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid per-seat enterprise platforms — ... CoachHub ($200–$800/seat/year) charge for every employee whether they use it or not” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid per-seat pricing from larger platforms (BetterUp, CoachHub) as they can be prohibitively expensive” MiniMax M2.5 · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · hard negative
“$200–$2,000+/user/yr | Enterprise (avoid for tight budgets)” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · hard negative
“they often require rigid per-seat licensing, high seat minimums, and premium enterprise budgets ($3,000 to $6,000+ per user annually)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoachHub, over the 131 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoachHub was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BetterUp115 of 13123Not in the top three
Boon Health60 of 13116Not in the top three
Torch59 of 1313Not in the top three
Growthspace58 of 13110Not in the top three
Exec53 of 1316Not in the top three
EZRA45 of 1311Not in the top three
Risely43 of 13114Not in the top three
Valence27 of 1311Not in the top three
Coachello26 of 1311Not in the top three
CoachAccountable15 of 1311Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoachHub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 110 of the 131 answers that named CoachHub and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com90
coachstackhub.ai53
coachello.ai50
torch.io46
exec.com39
coachhub.comYour site36
easygenerator.com34
coachilly.com30
g2.com30
360learning.com29

401 of the 437 domain citations in answers naming CoachHub came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoachHub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoachHub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coachhub.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack