Every category where a model named CoachAccountable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	17 of 116	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoachAccountable yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoachAccountable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative17 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Former users are recommended to consider CoachAccountable, UpCoach, or Coaching Loft as alternatives.” Llama 4 Maverick · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · alternative

“look for alternatives like CoachAccountable, UpCoach, or Coaching Loft, which are still operational” Mistral Small · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose CoachAccountable if you are a solo coach focused on tracking tangible client progress” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Every feature on every tier, no feature-gating | Small, stable client rosters on a budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoachAccountable, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoachAccountable was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoachHub15 of 240Not in the top three

Paperbell14 of 242Not in the top three

UpCoach14 of 240Not in the top three

BetterUp13 of 242Not in the top three

Simply.Coach10 of 244Not in the top three

Boon Health9 of 242Not in the top three

CoachVantage9 of 242Not in the top three

Growthspace9 of 240Not in the top three

Torch8 of 240Not in the top three

Risely7 of 242Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoachAccountable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 24 answers that named CoachAccountable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com11

circle.so10

coachilly.com10

group.app8

learningrevolution.net7

coachful.co6

coachstackhub.ai6

paperbell.com6

thinkific.com6

360learning.com5

Seventy-five of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming CoachAccountable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms11

circle.so/blog/best-coaching-platforms10

coachilly.com/coaching-software-review-202610

group.app/blog/online-coaching-platform8

learningrevolution.net/online-coaching-platforms7

360learning.com/blog/online-coaching-platforms5

adamenfroy.com/coaching-platforms5

thinkific.com/blog/best-online-coaching-platforms5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CoachAccountable

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CoachAccountable; a claim can dispute any of them.

Coach Accountable 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoachAccountable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoachAccountable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coachaccountable.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.