Every category where a model named Paperbell for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	18 of 116	0%	10	accepted challenger
Global payroll and employer of record	Core HR and payroll	0%	50 of 66	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Paperbell yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Paperbell across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative17 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Paperbell if you are a solo coach and want to spend less time on admin, billing, and contracts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best for: New or solo coaches focused on simple 1:1 package sales and streamlined onboarding.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose Upcoach/Paperbell if: You're an independent coach needing client management and delivery tools.” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Solo coaches who want everything in one place ... Paperbell bundles these” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Paperbell, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Paperbell was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoachAccountable14 of 211Not in the top three

CoachHub13 of 210Not in the top three

Simply.Coach12 of 214Not in the top three

UpCoach12 of 210Not in the top three

BetterUp11 of 212Not in the top three

CoachVantage11 of 210Not in the top three

Boon Health9 of 211Not in the top three

Delenta9 of 211Not in the top three

Circle9 of 210Not in the top three

Kajabi7 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Paperbell. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 21 answers that named Paperbell and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

circle.so13

boon-health.com10

coachilly.com9

group.app9

paperbell.comYour site7

torch.io7

coachful.co6

coachstackhub.ai6

delenta.com6

learningrevolution.net6

Seventy-two of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming Paperbell came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

circle.so/blog/best-coaching-platforms13

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms10

coachilly.com/coaching-software-review-20269

group.app/blog/online-coaching-platform9

torch.io/compare7

delenta.com/blog/coaching-support-platforms6

learningrevolution.net/online-coaching-platforms6

360learning.com/blog/online-coaching-platforms5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Paperbell's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Paperbell, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at paperbell.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.