Every category where a model named Kajabi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	24 of 116	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	0%	38 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	64 of 74	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	54 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	94 of 162	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kajabi yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kajabi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strongest on marketing and sales automation, but pricier than many alternatives” Perplexity Sonar · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Kajabi is useful if you want an all-in-one business platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Kajabi is the "all-in-one marketing machine,"” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Creator Platforms with High Transaction Fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kajabi, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kajabi was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Teachable20 of 302Not in the top three

Thinkific19 of 301Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand8 of 300Not in the top three

Circle7 of 300Not in the top three

Docebo7 of 300Not in the top three

Paperbell7 of 300Not in the top three

Udemy Business7 of 300Not in the top three

LearnWorlds6 of 304Not in the top three

CoachAccountable6 of 300Not in the top three

Skool6 of 300Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kajabi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 30 answers that named Kajabi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learnworlds.com11

group.app10

circle.so8

boon-health.com7

g2.com7

learningrevolution.net7

goskills.com6

kajabi.comYour site6

proprofstraining.com6

thinkific.com6

Sixty-eight of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming Kajabi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

circle.so/blog/best-coaching-platforms8

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms7

learnworlds.com/blog/business/online-learning-platforms6

coachilly.com/coaching-software-review-20264

group.app/blog/online-coaching-platform4

learningrevolution.net/online-coaching-platforms4

adamenfroy.com/coaching-platforms3

corporatevision-news.com/ranking-the-top-coaching-platforms-this-year-by-features3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kajabi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kajabi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kajabi.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.