Every category where a model named LearnWorlds for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	2%	15 of 86	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	17 of 74	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	73 of 116	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	45 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LearnWorlds yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LearnWorlds across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	3	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase16 labels6

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall for B2B: LearnWorlds” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Other affordable options include EducateMe, ProProfs Training Maker, and LearnWorlds.” Llama 4 Maverick · Learning management syst · budget prompt · alternative

“Offers affordable plans with good features for employee development.” MiniMax M2.5 · Learning management syst · budget prompt · alternative

“If it is measured by revenue, buy LearnWorlds or Thinkific.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LearnWorlds, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LearnWorlds was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentLMS30 of 4314Not in the top three

Thinkific17 of 433Not in the top three

Docebo17 of 431Not in the top three

360Learning13 of 433Not in the top three

GoSkills12 of 436Not in the top three

Teachable11 of 430Not in the top three

iSpring Learn11 of 430Not in the top three

Absorb LMS9 of 431Not in the top three

Connecteam8 of 431Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand8 of 431Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LearnWorlds. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 43 answers that named LearnWorlds and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learnworlds.comYour site19

goskills.com17

proprofstraining.com17

capterra.com16

peoplemanagingpeople.com15

g2.com13

forbes.com12

thirst.io11

d2l.com9

360learning.com8

118 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming LearnWorlds came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

capterra.com/resources/best-lms-for-small-business13

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-lms-for-small-business12

forbes.com/advisor/business/the-best-learning-management-systems11

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-small-business11

proprofstraining.com/blog/b2b-lms11

learnworlds.com/blog/business/best-lms-for-training-companies10

guideflow.com/blog/course-creation-software7

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-compared6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LearnWorlds's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LearnWorlds, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at learnworlds.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.