Every category where a model named Teachable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	28 of 116	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	62 of 74	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	46 of 73	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	0%	78 of 86	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	59 of 80	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	129 of 162	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Teachable yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Teachable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	2	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase14 labels2

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you sell courses, look at Teachable or Thinkific” Perplexity Sonar · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Many businesses confuse "course builders" (like Teachable or Thinkific) with actual B2B training software.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“some users advise caution due to inconsistent quality and the potential for misleading marketing” Mistral Small · Skills intelligence · negative prompt · soft negative

“Variable Instructor Quality: (Common in Udemy/Teachable)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

“Transaction Fees on Paid Plans... Platform Lock-In” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teachable, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teachable was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Thinkific27 of 384Not in the top three

Kajabi20 of 380Not in the top three

TalentLMS14 of 386Not in the top three

LearnWorlds11 of 383Not in the top three

Moodle8 of 380Not in the top three

Paperbell7 of 381Not in the top three

Circle7 of 380Not in the top three

CoachAccountable7 of 380Not in the top three

Docebo7 of 380Not in the top three

Absorb LMS6 of 381Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teachable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 38 answers that named Teachable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

proprofstraining.com11

g2.com9

learningrevolution.net9

thinkific.com9

circle.so8

boon-health.com7

forbes.com7

group.app7

guideflow.com7

learnworlds.com7

Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Teachable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

circle.so/blog/best-coaching-platforms8

proprofstraining.com/blog/b2b-lms8

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms7

guideflow.com/blog/course-creation-software6

forbes.com/advisor/business/the-best-learning-management-systems5

group.app/blog/online-coaching-platform5

learningrevolution.net/online-coaching-platforms5

adamenfroy.com/coaching-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Teachable

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Teachable; a claim can dispute any of them.

Thinkific/Teachable 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teachable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teachable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teachable.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.