Every category where a model named UpCoach for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	20 of 116	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UpCoach yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UpCoach across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Upcoach/Paperbell if: You're an independent coach needing client management and delivery tools.” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Former users are recommended to consider CoachAccountable, UpCoach, or Coaching Loft as alternatives.” Llama 4 Maverick · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose Upcoach if you sell group coaching, memberships, or cohort-based programs.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“look for alternatives like CoachAccountable, UpCoach, or Coaching Loft” Mistral Small · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UpCoach, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UpCoach was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoachAccountable14 of 200Not in the top three

BetterUp12 of 202Not in the top three

Paperbell12 of 202Not in the top three

CoachHub11 of 200Not in the top three

Simply.Coach8 of 203Not in the top three

Delenta7 of 201Not in the top three

CoachVantage7 of 200Not in the top three

Circle6 of 200Not in the top three

Profi6 of 200Not in the top three

Boon Health5 of 202Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UpCoach. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 20 answers that named UpCoach and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coachilly.com15

boon-health.com10

circle.so10

learningrevolution.net8

group.app7

coachful.co6

coachstackhub.ai6

simply.coach6

360learning.com5

delenta.com5

Seventy-eight of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming UpCoach came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coachilly.com/coaching-software-review-202614

circle.so/blog/best-coaching-platforms10

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms9

group.app/blog/online-coaching-platform7

learningrevolution.net/online-coaching-platforms7

360learning.com/blog/online-coaching-platforms5

coachful.co/blog/best-online-coaching-platforms5

coachstackhub.ai/compare/business-coaching-platforms5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as UpCoach

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as UpCoach; a claim can dispute any of them.

Upcoach 5upcoach 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UpCoach's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UpCoach, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at upcoach.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.