HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Profi · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Profi

11Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Profi was named 3 times in Coaching platforms, where Growthspace led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Profi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Coaching platformsLearning and development0%115 of 116100%3under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Profi yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Profi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00011
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Profi is reported to have shut down on December 31, 2025, so former users are being directed to alternatives.[6]” Perplexity Sonar · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“This platform shut down completely on December 31, 2025, after an acquisition.” Mistral Small · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“shut down on December 31, 2025, following an acquisition” Llama 4 Maverick · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Profi, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Profi was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CoachAccountable6 of 110Not in the top three
Coaches Console6 of 110Not in the top three
Coaching Lobby6 of 110Not in the top three
UpCoach6 of 110Not in the top three
CoachHub5 of 110Not in the top three
Coaching Loft5 of 110Not in the top three
BetterUp4 of 110Not in the top three
Growthspace3 of 110Not in the top three
Boon Health2 of 111Not in the top three
Coaching.com2 of 110Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Profi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Profi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coachilly.com10
paperbell.com5
reddit.com5
circle.so4
coachful.co4
delenta.com4
easywebinar.com4
mousaabkhaldi.com4
boon-health.com3
coachstackhub.ai3

Forty-six of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Profi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Profi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Profi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at profit.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.