HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Coachello · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Coachello

34Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Coaching platforms for enterprise buyers
Rank 30 of 116 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Coachello for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Coaching platformsLearning and development0%30 of 1160%5under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coachello yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coachello across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative14 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Coachello integrates directly into the workspace tools employees already use, like Slack and Microsoft Teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative
“Modular AI-first platforms like Coachello can offer more flexible pricing depending on program scope.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coachello, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coachello was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BetterUp28 of 3415Not in the top three
CoachHub26 of 346Not in the top three
Boon Health21 of 346Not in the top three
Exec19 of 343Not in the top three
Risely18 of 343Not in the top three
Valence18 of 340Not in the top three
EZRA16 of 340Not in the top three
Torch16 of 340Not in the top three
Growthspace15 of 340Not in the top three
Bravely8 of 341Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coachello. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 34 answers that named Coachello and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com28
coachello.aiYour site22
coachstackhub.ai15
torch.io13
easygenerator.com11
coachhub.com9
coachilly.com9
exec.com9
simply.coach9
togetherplatform.com9

112 of the 134 domain citations in answers naming Coachello came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coachello's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coachello, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coachello.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack