HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Bravely · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Bravely

19Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bravely was named 7 times in Coaching platforms, where Growthspace led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business38 of 112

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 116

under the label threshold

Enterprise12 of 48

under the label threshold

In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bravely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	4%	7 of 116	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bravely yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bravely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Bravely is the budget-friendly option for on-demand coaching open to every employee, not just leaders.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice

“the strongest choice is usually Bravely if you want affordable, broad employee access” Perplexity Sonar · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice

“Other options to consider are Together, Risely, Rocky.ai, EZRA, Sounding Board, Imperative, and Bravely.” Llama 4 Maverick · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · alternative

“Frequently cited as one of the most budget-friendly for accessing real human coaches.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bravely, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bravely was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoachHub14 of 192Not in the top three

BetterUp13 of 196Not in the top three

Boon Health13 of 191Not in the top three

Risely13 of 190Not in the top three

Valence12 of 191Not in the top three

EZRA11 of 191Not in the top three

Growthspace11 of 190Not in the top three

Exec10 of 192Not in the top three

Torch9 of 190Not in the top three

Coachello8 of 191Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bravely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 19 answers that named Bravely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boon-health.com17

torch.io10

coachello.ai9

coachilly.com8

easygenerator.com8

exec.com8

thinkific.com7

myculture.ai6

togetherplatform.com6

coachstackhub.ai5

Eighty-four of the eighty-four domain citations in answers naming Bravely came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

boon-health.com/learn/resources/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms16

torch.io/compare10

coachello.ai/blog/online-coaching-platform9

easygenerator.com/en/blog/e-learning/best-enterprise-coaching-platforms8

exec.com/learn/best-leadership-coaching-platforms8

coachilly.com/coaching-software-review-20267

myculture.ai/blog/best-leadership-coaching-platforms-for-hr-teams6

togetherplatform.com/blog/best-online-platforms-for-employee-coaching6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bravely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bravely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bravely.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.