Coaching platforms · October 2026 Edition
Growthspace vs Lattice
Three of fourteen models named Growthspace first on the direct prompt; five named Lattice. Growthspace was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Lattice by ten and Growthspace carries 23 labels and Lattice 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in nineteen categories this edition.
First-choice share20%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2311A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Growthspace reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Growthspace vs Exec · Growthspace vs Torch · Growthspace vs 15Five
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the coaching platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GrowthspaceFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLattice
Direct35
Paraphrase801 against Growthspace
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against Lattice
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Growthspace and Lattice stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Growthspace Lattice first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Growthspace on the left and Lattice on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Growthspace and Lattice stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.DeepSeek V4 FlashGrowthspace, Lattice alternatives: Betterworks
Growthspace first, Lattice not the choice
2 of 14 modelsLattice was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashGrowthspace, Jiminny alternatives: Avoma, Boon Health, Cloverleaf
Mistral SmallGrowthspace alternatives: Coachello, Motivosity
Lattice first, Growthspace an alternative
4 of 14 modelsGrowthspace was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniLattice alternatives: CoachHub, Culture Amp, Torch, Valence
Grok 4.1 FastLattice alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, CoachHub, Jiminny, Leapsome, Showpad Coach
Qwen 3.7 FlashLattice alternatives: Growthspace, Motivosity
Kimi K215Five, Lattice alternatives: Betterworks, CoachHub, Growthspace
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Boon Health, Torch alternatives: Avoma, Coachello, Gong, Growthspace, Risely, Sounding Board
Perplexity SonarTorch alternatives: Betterworks, Cloverleaf, Lattice
Llama 4 MaverickTorch alternatives: Growthspace, Lattice, Motivosity
GLM 4.7 FlashXBetterUp alternatives: CoachHub, Growthspace
MiniMax M2.5no first choice alternatives: BetterUp, CoachHub, Growthspace
Muse Glimmer 30BTorch alternatives: Boon Health, Exec, Growthspace
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-6 Luna15Five alternatives: BetterUp, Gong, Mindtickle, Torch
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Lattice leads by two points.
Lattice2%#– of 10Growthspace0%#– of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Growthspace leads at mid-market.
Growthspace20%#1 of 13Lattice9%#5 of 13Enterprise
Growthspace leads by two points.
Growthspace2%#7 of 12Lattice0%#– of 12What the models said about Growthspace
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Strong reviews (4.8/5 across 249 reviews) but more enterprise-oriented” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“If you want a dedicated coaching platform: Go with Growthspace. It's the highest-rated coaching-specific platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“two primary platforms depending on your specific organizational goals: Growthspace and Exec.com” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the top digital coaching marketplaces for a mid-sized B2B company are Growthspace and Exec.com” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Lattice
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
Growthspace vs ExecGrowthspace vs TorchGrowthspace vs 15FiveGrowthspace vs Boon HealthGrowthspace vs Simply.CoachGrowthspace vs CoachHubExec vs LatticeTorch vs Lattice15Five vs LatticeLattice vs Boon HealthLattice vs Simply.CoachLattice vs CoachHubAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full coaching platforms standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.