HR AI Index
Index Performance and talent management Goals and OKRs › Lattice vs Leapsome
Goals and OKRs · September 2026 Edition

Lattice vs Leapsome

Zero of twelve models named Lattice first on the direct prompt; zero named Leapsome. Lattice was named by eleven of the twelve models and Leapsome by eleven and Lattice carries 29 labels and Leapsome 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Lattice

accepted challenger

Named in nineteen categories this edition.

Leapsome

accepted challenger

Named in thirteen categories this edition.

First-choice share11%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2920A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lattice reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Tability vs Lattice · Tability vs Leapsome · Lattice vs Mooncamp

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LatticeFirst choices, of twelve modelsLeapsome
Direct00
Paraphrase521 against Lattice
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Lattice · 1 against Leapsome
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Lattice and Leapsome were named in the same answer 199 times, of the 672 answers naming Lattice and the 255 naming Leapsome. In those answers Leapsome took the first choice three times and Lattice fifty-six.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Lattice and Leapsome stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Lattice Leapsome first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lattice on the left and Leapsome on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lattice and Leapsome stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Leapsome, Tability
GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Asana, Lattice, Leapsome, WorkBoard
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co, Synergita, Teamflect
Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Quantive

Neither was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Grok 4.1 FastTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Mistral SmallMooncamp, Tability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Llama 4 MaverickTability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Mooncamp, Perdoo
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, WorkBoard
Kimi K2Mooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo
MiniMax M2.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Tability

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Lattice0%#13 of 13
Leapsome0%#– of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Lattice leads by seven points.
Lattice11%#2 of 17
Leapsome4%#7 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Lattice leads by two points.
Lattice2%#8 of 13
Leapsome0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Lattice

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Leapsome

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“HR-suite "goals modules" (Lattice, Leapsome, ...) ... Risky if you want dedicated OKR tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“For a mid-sized B2B company, Leapsome is often the most recommended for its balance of features, ease of use, and scalability.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Primary Recommendation: Leapsome” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.