HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs › Lattice vs Perdoo
Goals and OKRs · September 2026 Edition

Lattice vs Perdoo

Zero of twelve models named Lattice first on the direct prompt; one named Perdoo. Lattice was named by eleven of the twelve models and Perdoo by twelve and Lattice carries 29 labels and Perdoo 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Lattice

accepted challenger

Named in nineteen categories this edition.

Perdoo

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share11%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2939A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lattice reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Tability vs Lattice · Tability vs Perdoo · Lattice vs Mooncamp

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LatticeFirst choices, of twelve modelsPerdoo
Direct01
Paraphrase511 against Lattice
Comparative03
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Lattice · 1 against Perdoo
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Lattice and Perdoo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Lattice Perdoo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lattice on the left and Perdoo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lattice and Perdoo stood in it.

Perdoo first, Lattice an alternative

1 of 12 modelsLattice was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Asana, Lattice, Leapsome, WorkBoard

Neither was the first choice, one was named

10 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co, Synergita, Teamflect
Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Quantive
Grok 4.1 FastTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Mistral SmallMooncamp, Tability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Llama 4 MaverickTability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Mooncamp, Perdoo
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, WorkBoard
Kimi K2Mooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo
MiniMax M2.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Tability

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Leapsome, Tability

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Perdoo leads by four points.
Perdoo4%#6 of 13
Lattice0%#13 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Lattice leads at mid-market.
Lattice11%#2 of 17
Perdoo7%#5 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Lattice leads by two points.
Lattice2%#8 of 13
Perdoo0%#9 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Lattice

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Perdoo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Dated interface (though free tier available)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Perdoo, Tability, Mooncamp give structured OKR execution without enterprise configuration overhead.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want strict adherence to traditional OKR frameworks, Perdoo is excellent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Go with Teamflect (if on Microsoft 365) or Perdoo (for pure strategy).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Tability vs LatticeTability vs PerdooLattice vs MooncampLattice vs OKRs ToolLattice vs Profit.coLattice vs LeapsomeLattice vs 15FiveMooncamp vs PerdooOKRs Tool vs PerdooPerdoo vs Profit.coPerdoo vs LeapsomePerdoo vs 15FiveAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.