HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs › Perdoo vs 15Five
Goals and OKRs · September 2026 Edition

Perdoo vs 15Five

One of twelve models named Perdoo first on the direct prompt; zero named 15Five. Perdoo was named by twelve of the twelve models and 15Five by nine and Perdoo carries 39 labels and 15Five 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Perdoo

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

15Five

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

First-choice share7%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels3922A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Perdoo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Tability vs Perdoo · Tability vs 15Five · Lattice vs Perdoo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PerdooFirst choices, of twelve models15Five
Direct10
Paraphrase12
Comparative30
Budget-constrained10
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Perdoo · 2 against 15Five
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Perdoo and 15Five stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Perdoo 15Five first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Perdoo on the left and 15Five on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Perdoo and 15Five stood in it.

Perdoo first, 15Five not the choice

1 of 12 models15Five was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Asana, Lattice, Leapsome, WorkBoard

Neither was the first choice, one was named

10 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co, Synergita, Teamflect
Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Quantive
Grok 4.1 FastTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Mistral SmallMooncamp, Tability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Llama 4 MaverickTability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Mooncamp, Perdoo
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, WorkBoard
Kimi K2Mooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo
MiniMax M2.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Tability

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Leapsome, Tability

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Perdoo leads by four points.
Perdoo4%#6 of 13
15Five0%#11 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Perdoo leads by two points.
Perdoo7%#5 of 17
15Five4%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Perdoo0%#9 of 13
15Five0%#11 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Perdoo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Dated interface (though free tier available)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Perdoo, Tability, Mooncamp give structured OKR execution without enterprise configuration overhead.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want strict adherence to traditional OKR frameworks, Perdoo is excellent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Go with Teamflect (if on Microsoft 365) or Perdoo (for pure strategy).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about 15Five

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“15Five Goals. No migration paths; data risks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“I'd suggest Lattice if you want a comprehensive performance management system, or 15Five if your priority is empowering managers with coaching tools” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Tability vs PerdooTability vs 15FiveLattice vs PerdooLattice vs 15FiveMooncamp vs PerdooMooncamp vs 15FiveOKRs Tool vs PerdooOKRs Tool vs 15FivePerdoo vs Profit.coPerdoo vs LeapsomeProfit.co vs 15FiveLeapsome vs 15FiveAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.