Index › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs › Tability vs 15Five

Goals and OKRs · September 2026 Edition

Tability vs 15Five

Nine of twelve models named Tability first on the direct prompt; zero named 15Five. Tability was named by eleven of the twelve models and 15Five by nine and Tability carries 44 labels and 15Five 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Tability

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

15Five

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

First-choice share29%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate0%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.

Labels4422A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Tability reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Perdoo was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Tability vs Lattice · Tability vs Mooncamp · Tability vs OKRs Tool

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

TabilityFirst choices, of twelve models15Five

Direct90

Paraphrase12

Comparative40

Budget-constrained20

Scale-constrained10

Negative102 against 15Five

Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Tability and 15Five stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5

Tability

15Five

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Tability on the left and 15Five on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Tability and 15Five stood in it.

Tability first, 15Five an alternative

9 of 12 models15Five was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co, Synergita, Teamflect

Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Quantive

Grok 4.1 FastTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co

Mistral SmallMooncamp, Tability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo

DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co

Llama 4 MaverickTability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Mooncamp, Perdoo

Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, WorkBoard

Kimi K2Mooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co

GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Leapsome, Tability

MiniMax M2.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Tability

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Asana, Lattice, Leapsome, WorkBoard

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Tability leads by thirty-seven points.

Tability#1 of 13

15Five#11 of 13

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Tability leads by twenty-four points.

Tability#1 of 17

15Five#8 of 17

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Tability leads by six points.

Tability#4 of 13

15Five#11 of 13

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Tability

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Tability is built to solve the execution gap. It is highly recommended for Operations, Chiefs of Staff, or business leaders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The best OKR software for a company with a limited budget is Tability, which ranks first in a comparison of 12 tools.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice

“a lightweight dedicated tool (Tability, Weekdone, Mooncamp) is justified; ... Profit.co, Perdoo, Tability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about 15Five

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“15Five Goals. No migration paths; data risks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative

“I'd suggest Lattice if you want a comprehensive performance management system, or 15Five if your priority is empowering managers with coaching tools” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

Also compared

Tability vs Lattice Tability vs Mooncamp Tability vs OKRs Tool Tability vs Perdoo Tability vs Profit.co Tability vs Leapsome Lattice vs 15Five Mooncamp vs 15Five OKRs Tool vs 15Five Perdoo vs 15Five Profit.co vs 15Five Leapsome vs 15Five All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.