Profit.co vs 15Five
Zero of twelve models named Profit.co first on the direct prompt; zero named 15Five. Profit.co was named by eleven of the twelve models and 15Five by nine and Profit.co carries 33 labels and 15Five 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in eleven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
By framing
Profit.coFirst choices, of twelve models15Five
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Profit.co 15Five first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Profit.co on the left and 15Five on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Profit.co7%#3 of 1315Five0%#11 of 13Profit.co14%#3 of 1315Five0%#11 of 13What the models said about Profit.co
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid Profit.co (overwhelming complexity)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“it has a steep learning curve because every key result must first be mapped to a defined KPI system” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“The user interface has a steeper learning curve and can feel complex for beginners.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Profit.co's free plan stands out as the most comprehensive free option that doesn't sacrifice essential features.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Profit.co - *Best overall free plan* - Permanently free plan with unlimited OKRs and unlimited users” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“my top pick is Profit.co because it offers a permanently free plan with broad OKR functionality” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about 15Five
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“15Five Goals. No migration paths; data risks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“I'd suggest Lattice if you want a comprehensive performance management system, or 15Five if your priority is empowering managers with coaching tools” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.