HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs › Mooncamp vs 15Five
Goals and OKRs · September 2026 Edition

Mooncamp vs 15Five

Five of twelve models named Mooncamp first on the direct prompt; zero named 15Five. Mooncamp was named by eleven of the twelve models and 15Five by nine and Mooncamp carries 25 labels and 15Five 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Mooncamp

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

15Five

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

First-choice share11%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2522A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Mooncamp reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Tability vs Mooncamp · Tability vs 15Five · Lattice vs Mooncamp

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MooncampFirst choices, of twelve models15Five
Direct50
Paraphrase02
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against 15Five
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Mooncamp and 15Five stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Mooncamp 15Five first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Mooncamp on the left and 15Five on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Mooncamp and 15Five stood in it.

Mooncamp first, 15Five not the choice

5 of 12 models15Five was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Leapsome, Tability
Mistral SmallMooncamp, Tability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, WorkBoard
Kimi K2Mooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co
MiniMax M2.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Tability

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co, Synergita, Teamflect
Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Quantive
Grok 4.1 FastTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Llama 4 MaverickTability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Mooncamp, Perdoo
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Asana, Lattice, Leapsome, WorkBoard

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mooncamp leads by two points.
Mooncamp2%#10 of 13
15Five0%#11 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Mooncamp leads by seven points.
Mooncamp11%#3 of 17
15Five4%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Mooncamp leads by six points.
Mooncamp6%#5 of 13
15Five0%#11 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Mooncamp

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with Tability or Mooncamp for the best balance of features, price, and ease of use” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Tability and Mooncamp are the top choices due to their strong mid-market focus” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Mooncamp has risen quickly to the top of rankings for mid-to-large organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about 15Five

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“15Five Goals. No migration paths; data risks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“I'd suggest Lattice if you want a comprehensive performance management system, or 15Five if your priority is empowering managers with coaching tools” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Tability vs MooncampTability vs 15FiveLattice vs MooncampLattice vs 15FiveMooncamp vs OKRs ToolMooncamp vs PerdooMooncamp vs Profit.coMooncamp vs LeapsomeOKRs Tool vs 15FivePerdoo vs 15FiveProfit.co vs 15FiveLeapsome vs 15FiveAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.