HR AI Index
Index Performance and talent management Goals and OKRs › Mooncamp vs Perdoo
Goals and OKRs · September 2026 Edition

Mooncamp vs Perdoo

Five of twelve models named Mooncamp first on the direct prompt; one named Perdoo. Mooncamp was named by eleven of the twelve models and Perdoo by twelve and Mooncamp carries 25 labels and Perdoo 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Mooncamp

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Perdoo

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share11%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2539A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Mooncamp reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Tability vs Mooncamp · Tability vs Perdoo · Lattice vs Mooncamp

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MooncampFirst choices, of twelve modelsPerdoo
Direct51
Paraphrase01
Comparative03
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Perdoo
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Mooncamp and Perdoo were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 73 answers naming Mooncamp and the 103 naming Perdoo. In those answers Perdoo took the first choice three times and Mooncamp five.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Mooncamp and Perdoo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Mooncamp Perdoo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Mooncamp on the left and Perdoo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Mooncamp and Perdoo stood in it.

Mooncamp first, Perdoo an alternative

5 of 12 modelsPerdoo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Leapsome, Tability
Mistral SmallMooncamp, Tability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, WorkBoard
Kimi K2Mooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co
MiniMax M2.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Tability

Perdoo first, Mooncamp not the choice

1 of 12 modelsMooncamp was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Asana, Lattice, Leapsome, WorkBoard

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co, Synergita, Teamflect
Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Quantive
Grok 4.1 FastTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Llama 4 MaverickTability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Mooncamp, Perdoo
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Perdoo leads by two points.
Perdoo4%#6 of 13
Mooncamp2%#10 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Mooncamp leads at mid-market.
Mooncamp11%#3 of 17
Perdoo7%#5 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Mooncamp leads by six points.
Mooncamp6%#5 of 13
Perdoo0%#9 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Mooncamp

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with Tability or Mooncamp for the best balance of features, price, and ease of use” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Tability and Mooncamp are the top choices due to their strong mid-market focus” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Mooncamp has risen quickly to the top of rankings for mid-to-large organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Perdoo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Dated interface (though free tier available)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Perdoo, Tability, Mooncamp give structured OKR execution without enterprise configuration overhead.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want strict adherence to traditional OKR frameworks, Perdoo is excellent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Go with Teamflect (if on Microsoft 365) or Perdoo (for pure strategy).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.