Tability vs Perdoo
Nine of twelve models named Tability first on the direct prompt; one named Perdoo. Tability was named by eleven of the twelve models and Perdoo by twelve and Tability carries 44 labels and Perdoo 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
By framing
TabilityFirst choices, of twelve modelsPerdoo
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Tability and Perdoo were named in the same answer seventy-one times, of the 111 answers naming Tability and the 103 naming Perdoo. In those answers Perdoo took the first choice four times and Tability thirty-five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Tability Perdoo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Tability on the left and Perdoo on the right.The direct prompt
Tability first, Perdoo an alternative
9 of 12 modelsPerdoo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Perdoo first, Tability not the choice
1 of 12 modelsTability was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Tability37%#1 of 13Perdoo4%#6 of 13Tability29%#1 of 17Perdoo7%#5 of 17What the models said about Tability
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Tability is built to solve the execution gap. It is highly recommended for Operations, Chiefs of Staff, or business leaders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best OKR software for a company with a limited budget is Tability, which ranks first in a comparison of 12 tools.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“a lightweight dedicated tool (Tability, Weekdone, Mooncamp) is justified; ... Profit.co, Perdoo, Tability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Perdoo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Dated interface (though free tier available)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Perdoo, Tability, Mooncamp give structured OKR execution without enterprise configuration overhead.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want strict adherence to traditional OKR frameworks, Perdoo is excellent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Go with Teamflect (if on Microsoft 365) or Perdoo (for pure strategy).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.