HR AI Index
Index Performance and talent management Goals and OKRs › Leapsome vs 15Five
Goals and OKRs · September 2026 Edition

Leapsome vs 15Five

Zero of twelve models named Leapsome first on the direct prompt; zero named 15Five. Leapsome was named by eleven of the twelve models and 15Five by nine and Leapsome carries 20 labels and 15Five 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Leapsome

accepted challenger

Named in thirteen categories this edition.

15Five

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2022A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Leapsome reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Tability vs Leapsome · Tability vs 15Five · Lattice vs Leapsome

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LeapsomeFirst choices, of twelve models15Five
Direct00
Paraphrase22
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Leapsome · 2 against 15Five
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Leapsome and 15Five were named in the same answer 123 times, of the 255 answers naming Leapsome and the 368 naming 15Five. In those answers 15Five took the first choice eight times and Leapsome zero.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Leapsome and 15Five stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Leapsome 15Five first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Leapsome on the left and 15Five on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Leapsome and 15Five stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Leapsome, Tability
GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Asana, Lattice, Leapsome, WorkBoard
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co, Synergita, Teamflect

Neither was named

9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Quantive
Grok 4.1 FastTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Mistral SmallMooncamp, Tability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Llama 4 MaverickTability alternatives: FlowyTeam, Mooncamp, Perdoo
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, WorkBoard
Kimi K2Mooncamp, Tability alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo
MiniMax M2.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Tability

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Leapsome0%#– of 13
15Five0%#11 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Leapsome4%#7 of 17
15Five4%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Leapsome0%#– of 13
15Five0%#11 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Leapsome

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“HR-suite "goals modules" (Lattice, Leapsome, ...) ... Risky if you want dedicated OKR tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“For a mid-sized B2B company, Leapsome is often the most recommended for its balance of features, ease of use, and scalability.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Primary Recommendation: Leapsome” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about 15Five

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“15Five Goals. No migration paths; data risks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“I'd suggest Lattice if you want a comprehensive performance management system, or 15Five if your priority is empowering managers with coaching tools” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.