Goals and OKRs · October 2026 Edition
Mooncamp vs Betterworks
Three of fourteen models named Mooncamp first on the direct prompt; zero named Betterworks. Mooncamp was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Betterworks by thirteen and both carry 26 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2626Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Mooncamp reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Perdoo was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Perdoo vs Mooncamp · Perdoo vs Betterworks · Tability vs Mooncamp
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MooncampFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBetterworks
Direct301 against Betterworks
Paraphrase111 against Betterworks
Comparative001 against Betterworks
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Mooncamp · 3 against Betterworks
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Mooncamp and Betterworks stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Mooncamp Betterworks first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Mooncamp on the left and Betterworks on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Mooncamp and Betterworks stood in it.
Mooncamp first, Betterworks not the choice
3 of 14 modelsBetterworks was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Perdoo
Muse Glimmer 30BMooncamp, Tability alternatives: HiBob, Perdoo, Profit.co
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo
Grok 4.1 FastLattice alternatives: Mooncamp, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Mistral SmallPerdoo, Tability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp
DeepSeek V4 FlashPerdoo alternatives: Microsoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, Profit.co
Kimi K2Tability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
MiniMax M2.5Tability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Profit.co, WorkBoard
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Oboard, Perdoo, Profit.co
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo alternatives: Lattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mooncamp leads by five points.
Mooncamp5%#5 of 17Betterworks0%#16 of 17Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: Betterworks leads at enterprise.
Betterworks23%#2 of 13Mooncamp0%#7 of 13What the models said about Mooncamp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Mooncamp — only 2 reviews on Gartner” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mooncamp is an OKR and strategy execution platform built for mid-market and enterprise organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Mooncamp is the most frequently recommended mid-market/enterprise specialist” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Mooncamp and Perdoo are currently considered the top choices” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Betterworks
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Enterprise-heavy platforms (e.g., WorkBoard, Betterworks, Ally.io): Great for large orgs but criticized for ... Complexity: Mandatory fields overload, feature bloat” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like Lattice, Leapsome, Betterworks... often fall short when strategy or operations teams need a leadership cockpit.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tability and Betterworks are the top choices” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Perdoo vs MooncampPerdoo vs BetterworksTability vs MooncampTability vs BetterworksLattice vs MooncampLattice vs BetterworksOKRs Tool vs MooncampOKRs Tool vs BetterworksProfit.co vs MooncampProfit.co vs BetterworksMooncamp vs WorkBoardBetterworks vs WorkBoardAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.