AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › Performance management › Teamflect vs Small Improvements
Performance management · October 2026 Edition

Teamflect vs Small Improvements

Zero of fourteen models named Teamflect first on the direct prompt; zero named Small Improvements. Teamflect was named by seven of the fourteen models and Small Improvements by ten and both carry 11 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.

Teamflect

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

Small Improvements

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share5%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1111Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teamflect reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lattice was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs Teamflect · Lattice vs Small Improvements · Zoho People vs Teamflect

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the performance management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeamflectFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSmall Improvements
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained31
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Teamflect
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Teamflect and Small Improvements were named in the same answer thirty-three times, of the 149 answers naming Teamflect and the 93 naming Small Improvements. In those answers Small Improvements took the first choice three times and Teamflect five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teamflect and Small Improvements stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Teamflect Small Improvements first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamflect on the left and Small Improvements on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teamflect and Small Improvements stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, PerformYard
GPT-5.4 miniHiBob alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Rippling
Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, PerformYard
Perplexity SonarLattice alternatives: ClearCompany, Culture Amp, Engagedly, PerformYard
Grok 4.1 Fast15Five, Lattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Deel, HiBob
Mistral Small15Five, Lattice
DeepSeek V4 FlashLattice alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome
Llama 4 MaverickLattice alternatives: Betterworks
Qwen 3.7 FlashLeverage alternatives: Betterworks, BigDeals, Lattice, Spiff
Kimi K2Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard
GLM 4.7 FlashXLattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Engagedly, Leapsome
MiniMax M2.5Lattice alternatives: Betterworks, PerformYard
GPT-6 LunaLattice alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, PerformYard
Muse Glimmer 30BLattice alternatives: BambooHR, Leapsome, Namely, PerformYard

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Small Improvements leads by two points.
Small Improvements4%#9 of 12
Teamflect2%#10 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Teamflect leads at mid-market.
Teamflect5%#5 of 15
Small Improvements2%#7 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Neither is named for this buyer.
Teamflect—not named
Small Improvements—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Teamflect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“While not highly rated overall, some specific concerns include: Limited functionality” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“For the absolute lowest budget, Effy AI, Zoho People, Teamflect, or Leapsome's free plans are excellent starting points.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have 10 or fewer users and want a no-cost solution: Start with Teamflect, Profit.co, or Leapsome.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Small Improvements

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Small Improvements at $3/user/month offers the best value for money.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Small Improvements if you have 20+ staff and want the lowest possible per-head cost.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
“For larger small businesses (20+ employees), Small Improvements provides excellent value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.