Index › Performance and talent management › Performance management › Enterprise › September 2026 Edition

Performance management for enterprise buyers

Asked as “performance management software”, and as “performance review tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.

Standing

Workday

Contested

32% of first choices, contested.

ShowinginAll 50 categories →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

Small business

Effy AI19%ContestedStanding →Mid-market

Lattice41%Clear leaderStanding →Enterprise

Workday32%ContestedThis page

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.

ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant

Workday22%51endorsed leader

Betterworks4%46accepted challenger

Lattice28%47criticized challenger

SAP SuccessFactors17%35accepted challenger

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM13%15accepted challenger

OneStream0%10accepted challenger

Leapsome25%16criticized challenger

15Five39%23criticized challenger

Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate

Culture Amp30%20criticized challenger

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Head to head

Lattice vs PerformYard Lattice vs 15Five PerformYard vs 15Five

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default

Negative label rate →

Accepted challengerEndorsed leader

0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%

Key

Workday32%

Betterworks25%

Lattice12%

SAP SuccessFactors11%

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM4%

OneStream2%

Leapsome2%

15Five2%

Culture Amp0%

02What they warned about

Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.

Lattice

28%

13 of 47 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 2 hard negative

“**Vendors to Avoid:** *Certain smaller SaaS providers (e.g., basic tiers of Lattice, Culture Amp” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

Workday

22%

11 of 51 labels negative · 8 of 12 models

“Users report "enterprise-dated" UX and note that continuous performance management features lag behind newer competitors like Lattice” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt

15Five

39%

9 of 23 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative

“**Customization and ease-of-use complaints** dominate... Ideal for <1,000 users, not enterprise sprawl.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

Culture Amp

30%

6 of 20 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative

“**Vendors to Avoid:** *Certain smaller SaaS providers (e.g., basic tiers of Lattice, Culture Amp” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: twelve of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

67 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 5 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 909 links across 261 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

betterworks.com

vendor site · Betterworks41 answers · 74 citations · 11 models

okrstool.com

vendor site · OKRs Tool33 answers · 33 citations · 10 models

peoplemanagingpeople.com

vendor site · People Managing People27 answers · 31 citations · 10 models

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com

23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models

tech.co

23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models

workhuman.com

vendor site · Workhuman23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models

learn.g2.com

22 answers · 29 citations · 11 models

selectsoftwarereviews.com

vendor site · Select Software Reviews22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models

sprad.io

vendor site · Sprad15 answers · 23 citations · 8 models

forbes.com

14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models

hrcloud.com

vendor site · HR Cloud14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models

peoplegoal.com

vendor site · PeopleGoal12 answers · 14 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

okrstool.com/blog/performance-management-software

32 answers · 10 models

betterworks.com/magazine/best-performance-management-software

27 answers · 10 models

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/performance-management-tools

24 answers · 9 models

tech.co/hr-software/performance-management-software

23 answers · 9 models

betterworks.com/magazine/best-performance-evaluation-software

22 answers · 10 models

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/performance-management-software

22 answers · 10 models

workhuman.com/blog/best-performance-management-software

22 answers · 9 models

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/amp/tools/10-best-performance-management-s…

20 answers · 9 models

learn.g2.com/best-performance-management-software

18 answers · 10 models

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-performance-management-software

11 answers · 9 models

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.

ModelDirect“What is the best performance management software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which performance review tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade performance management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best performance management software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a performance management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which performance management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”

Claude Haiku 4.5Betterworks

Three alternatives

Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

Betterworks, WorkdayChanged

Three alternatives

Cornerstone OnDemand, Culture Amp, Lattice

no first choiceBetterworks

Three alternatives

Dayforce, SAP SuccessFactors, Workleap

against: Latticeno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Workday

GPT-5.4 miniWorkday

Three alternatives

Lattice, Leapsome, SAP SuccessFactors

WorkdayHeld

Two alternatives

Cornerstone OnDemand, Lattice

no first choiceBetterworks

One alternative

15Five

no first choicenothing named

Gemini 3.5 FlashBetterworks

Eleven alternatives

Anaplan, CaptivateIQ, Lattice, OneStream, SAP SuccessFactors, Salesforce Spiff, Teamflect, Varicent, Vena, Workday, Xactly

BetterworksHeld

Four alternatives

Culture Amp, Lattice, Teamflect, Workday

no first choiceOneStream, emPerform

Four alternatives

PerformYard, Planful, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

against: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Oracle Hyperionno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

Perplexity SonarWorkday

Two alternatives

Betterworks, SAP SuccessFactors

against: Lattice, LeapsomeBetterworks, WorkdayChanged

One alternative

Lattice

Betterworks

Three alternatives

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

against: LatticeWorkday

Three alternatives

Betterworks, Darwinbox, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM

against: PeopleGoalno first choice

Six alternatives

Betterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

against: 15Five, Lattice, Motivosity, Small Improvements, Teamflect, ThriveSparrow, Workleap

Grok 4.1 FastSAP SuccessFactors, Workday

Two alternatives

Betterworks, Lattice

WorkdayChanged

Two alternatives

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors

Workday

Three alternatives

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro

SAP SuccessFactors

Two alternatives

Betterworks, PerformYard

against: WorkdayOracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

Five alternatives

15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, Workhuman

against: 15Five, BambooHR, Culture Amp, Dayforce, Engagedly, Lattice, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors, Teamflect, Workday

Mistral SmallBetterworks, Workday

Three alternatives

15Five, BambooHR, Lattice

15Five, LatticeChanged

Two alternatives

Betterworks, Workday

Workday

Four alternatives

Betterworks, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors

Betterworks

Three alternatives

Culture Amp, Leapsome, Workday

no first choiceagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, PerformYard

DeepSeek V4 FlashBetterworks, Lattice

Three alternatives

Culture Amp, Leapsome, Workday

Betterworks, LatticeHeld

Two alternatives

SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Six alternatives

Anaplan, Board International, IBM Planning Analytics, SAP Analytics Cloud, Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik, Workday Adaptive Planning

Leapsome

One alternative

Betterworks

against: SAP SuccessFactors, Workdayno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

Llama 4 MaverickWorkday

Three alternatives

15Five, Betterworks, Performance Pro

BetterworksChanged

Two alternatives

Darwinbox, Lattice

Workday

Three alternatives

15Five, Betterworks, Lattice

Betterworks

Four alternatives

Darwinbox, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, PeopleStrong, Workday

Lattice

Three alternatives

Leapsome, MangoApps, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM

against: 15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, PerformYard, Workhuman

Qwen 3.7 FlashSAP SuccessFactors, Workday

Four alternatives

Betterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM

Lattice, WorkdayChanged

One alternative

Leapsome

Betterworks

Four alternatives

Lattice, Leapsome, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

Betterworks

Three alternatives

15Five, Lattice, Workday

no first choiceagainst: Asana, Culture Amp, Jira, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Glint, Monday.com, PeopleSoft, Qualtrics, SAP, Smartsheet, Trello, Workday

Kimi K2Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday

Four alternatives

15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors

SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayChanged

One alternative

Betterworks

against: 15Five, LatticePigment

Six alternatives

Anaplan, Board International, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM

Three alternatives

IceHrm Pro, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors

against: Workdayno first choice

Three alternatives

Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

against: 15Five, Culture Ampagainst: 15Five, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

GLM 4.7 FlashXLattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning

Ten alternatives

15Five, Anaplan, BambooHR, Leapsome, Mooncamp, OneStream, PeopleGoal, Planful, Tability, Vena

WorkdayChanged

Five alternatives

Betterworks, Culture Amp, Darwinbox, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors

OneStream

Nine alternatives

Anaplan, Board International, Jedox, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, SAP EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: EPM Live, Epicor, Infor EPMDayforce, SAP SuccessFactors

One alternative

Betterworks

against: BambooHR, Lattice, Workday, Workhumanno first choicenothing named

MiniMax M2.5Workday

Two alternatives

Betterworks, Performance Pro

Lattice, WorkdayChanged

Two alternatives

Betterworks, PeopleGoal

Workday

Three alternatives

Anaplan, Betterworks, OneStream

WorkSpark

Three alternatives

Betterworks, Darwinbox, Workday

against: OKRs Toolno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Gusto, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday

Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record

Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.

Prompt	Model	Version string	Time (UTC)	Searched	Sources	Latency
Direct recommendation	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 20:48	yes	9	9 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 18:17	yes	1	6 s
Direct recommendation	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 18:58	yes	13	24 s
Direct recommendation	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 19:09	yes	20	5 s
Direct recommendation	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 20:49	yes	40	18 s
Direct recommendation	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 21:31	yes	5	5 s
Direct recommendation	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 20:18	yes	16	21 s
Direct recommendation	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 20:10	yes	5	2 s
Direct recommendation	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 21:42	yes	10	29 s
Direct recommendation	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 18:50	yes	15	25 s
Direct recommendation	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 21:27	yes	20	54 s
Direct recommendation	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 18:01	yes	7	23 s
Paraphrase	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 20:44	yes	9	10 s
Paraphrase	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 18:27	yes	4	5 s
Paraphrase	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 19:11	yes	7	20 s
Paraphrase	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 21:38	yes	20	9 s
Paraphrase	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 18:13	yes	36	17 s
Paraphrase	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 18:25	no	0	3 s
Paraphrase	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 20:08	yes	18	17 s
Paraphrase	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 20:49	yes	5	3 s
Paraphrase	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 18:03	yes	5	23 s
Paraphrase	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 20:52	yes	9	20 s
Paraphrase	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 21:05	yes	11	72 s
Paraphrase	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 21:44	yes	5	15 s
Comparative	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 21:42	yes	15	9 s
Comparative	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 18:54	yes	8	14 s
Comparative	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 19:29	yes	16	27 s
Comparative	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 18:51	yes	20	9 s
Comparative	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 21:16	yes	33	19 s
Comparative	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 20:45	yes	14	15 s
Comparative	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 20:52	yes	19	23 s
Comparative	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 21:13	yes	5	3 s
Comparative	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 21:36	yes	5	25 s
Comparative	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 19:36	yes	18	37 s
Comparative	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 18:23	yes	28	51 s
Comparative	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 20:41	yes	5	12 s
Budget constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 19:56	yes	15	9 s
Budget constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 20:51	yes	2	5 s
Budget constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 18:46	yes	17	27 s
Budget constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 20:32	yes	20	7 s
Budget constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 21:20	yes	35	21 s
Budget constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 19:31	yes	5	5 s
Budget constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 18:23	yes	24	43 s
Budget constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 21:37	yes	5	3 s
Budget constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 20:18	yes	9	64 s
Budget constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 21:16	yes	23	46 s
Budget constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 20:00	yes	23	51 s
Budget constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 20:46	yes	16	50 s
Scale constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 18:04	yes	18	11 s
Scale constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 18:05	no	0	7 s
Scale constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 18:13	no	0	16 s
Scale constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 21:06	yes	18	10 s
Scale constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 18:54	yes	14	12 s
Scale constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 19:32	no	0	8 s
Scale constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 18:21	yes	19	26 s
Scale constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 18:33	yes	5	4 s
Scale constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 19:45	no	0	28 s
Scale constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 18:56	yes	22	40 s
Scale constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 18:07	yes	14	115 s
Scale constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 18:56	yes	5	30 s
Negative framing	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 21:14	yes	17	10 s
Negative framing	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 17:54	yes	3	6 s
Negative framing	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 17:55	yes	13	25 s
Negative framing	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 20:56	yes	20	7 s
Negative framing	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 21:04	yes	23	16 s
Negative framing	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 20:47	yes	5	6 s
Negative framing	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 19:41	yes	30	40 s
Negative framing	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 20:13	yes	5	4 s
Negative framing	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 21:47	yes	14	43 s
Negative framing	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 18:06	yes	27	37 s
Negative framing	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 20:57	yes	19	93 s
Negative framing	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 17:56	yes	14	30 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings

Board read as Board International

Ceridian Dayforce read as Dayforce

Cornerstone read as Cornerstone OnDemand

Glint read as Microsoft Viva Glint

HiBob HRIS read as HiBob

Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM

Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM

Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM

Workday HCM read as Workday

Unresolved, counted raw

Axiom

CCH Tagetik

EPM Live

Epicor

Oracle Hyperion

Planview Enterprise One

SAP Analytics Cloud / Group Reporting

SAP EPM (Analytics Cloud)

Tempo Timesheets

Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik

WorkSpark

emPerform

Discontinued, still offered

No shut-down product was recommended here.

Performance management for enterprise buyers

By buyer segment

01The standing

Recommended versus criticized

02What they warned about

03What they cite

Sites the answers cite

Pages the answers cite

04How they answered

05The record

Normalization in this category

Also in performance and talent management