AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › Succession planning › Teamflect vs PerformYard
Succession planning · October 2026 Edition

Teamflect vs PerformYard

Zero of fourteen models named Teamflect first on the direct prompt; zero named PerformYard. Teamflect was named by eight of the fourteen models and PerformYard by seven and Teamflect carries 10 labels and PerformYard 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Teamflect

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

PerformYard

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share7%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1013A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teamflect reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lattice was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs Teamflect · Lattice vs PerformYard · Engagedly vs Teamflect

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the succession planning page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeamflectFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPerformYard
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained42
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Teamflect and PerformYard were named in the same answer thirty-one times, of the 149 answers naming Teamflect and the 151 naming PerformYard. In those answers PerformYard took the first choice three times and Teamflect two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teamflect and PerformYard stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Teamflect PerformYard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamflect on the left and PerformYard on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teamflect and PerformYard stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashSuccessionStack alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, PerformYard, TalentGuard Succession Planning
Grok 4.1 FastEngagedly alternatives: BambooHR, Lattice, PerformYard, SuccessionNow

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Peoplebox alternatives: ChartHop, Engagedly, Lattice
GPT-5.4 miniHiBob alternatives: BambooHR add-ons / partner ecosystem, ClearCompany, Cornerstone Talent Management / Talent Experience, UKG Pro Succession Planning, Workday Succession Planning
Perplexity SonarEngagedly, Lattice alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Dayforce, UKG Pro Succession Planning
Mistral SmallEngagedly, Lattice alternatives: SuccessionNow, TalentGuard Succession Planning
DeepSeek V4 FlashSuccessionHR alternatives: BambooHR, Cornerstone Galaxy, PeopleFluent Succession Management
Llama 4 MaverickSuccessionHR alternatives: Cornerstone, Engagedly
Qwen 3.7 FlashEngagedly alternatives: BambooHR, Cornerstone Succession, Dayforce, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
Kimi K2BambooHR, HiBob alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Fuel50
GLM 4.7 FlashXEngagedly alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Dayforce, Lattice, PeopleFluent Succession Management, SuccessionNow, UKG Pro Succession Planning
MiniMax M2.5Lattice alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Deel HR, Qooper, TalentGuard Succession Planning
GPT-6 Luna15Five alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
Muse Glimmer 30BBambooHR, Engagedly alternatives: Lattice, Paylocity, SuccessionHR, UKG Pro Succession Planning

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
PerformYard leads by four points.
PerformYard11%#3 of 11
Teamflect7%#6 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Teamflect leads at mid-market.
Teamflect7%#4 of 13
PerformYard4%#6 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Teamflect0%#– of 10
PerformYard0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Teamflect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“the best choice is usually Teamflect if you're already using Microsoft Teams/Outlook, because it has a free starter plan for up to 10 users” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about PerformYard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“If you want the best visual tool for performance-based succession: Go with PerformYard ($5/user/month).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“PerformYard and Empxtrack offer the lowest per-user pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.