HR AI Index
Index Workforce planning and analytics Org charts › Organimi vs draw.io
Org charts and org design · September 2026 Edition

Organimi vs draw.io

One of twelve models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; zero named draw.io. Organimi was named by twelve of the twelve models and draw.io by ten and Organimi carries 40 labels and draw.io 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Organimi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

draw.io

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share17%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4015A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Organimi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lucidchart was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs draw.io · Organimi vs OneDirectory

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OrganimiFirst choices, of twelve modelsdraw.io
Direct10
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained74
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Organimi · 2 against draw.io
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Organimi and draw.io were named in the same answer twenty-four times, of the 103 answers naming Organimi and the 32 naming draw.io. In those answers draw.io took the first choice six times and Organimi ten.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Organimi and draw.io stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Organimi draw.io first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Organimi on the left and draw.io on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Organimi and draw.io stood in it.

Organimi first, draw.io not the choice

1 of 12 modelsdraw.io was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Organimi alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana
Grok 4.1 FastLucidchart, Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi
Mistral SmallOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
Llama 4 MaverickOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
Kimi K2OneDirectory alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard
MiniMax M2.5OneDirectory alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarOneDirectory alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Organimi leads by twenty-seven points.
Organimi31%#1 of 12
draw.io4%#6 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Organimi leads by ten points.
Organimi17%#2 of 14
draw.io8%#5 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Organimi leads by two points.
Organimi2%#7 of 13
draw.io0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Organimi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Known for print/export problems (especially on larger orgs) and poor in-browser zoom/visibility.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi (4.3/5) has export/print glitches, poor customization (2/10 in tests), Safari issues” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi is suitable for organizations of all sizes, from mid-market businesses to global enterprises, making it a scalable solution that grows with your team.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For a startup (<25 employees): Use Organimi. It is the cleanest dedicated tool and costs nothing until you grow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about draw.io

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Avoid using general diagramming tools for org charts ... these lack org-specific layout automation. Creating messy connector routing in dense charts is a common problem.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools like draw.io, Google Drawings, Miro, and sometimes Creately are often described as manual diagramming tools ... they do not provide strong native HR-to-org-chart automation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“start with draw.io (free) or Canva (free tier) for basic needs” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with draw.io if you're comfortable building charts manually” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with draw.io—it's versatile, powerful, and zero cost/risk.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.