HR AI Index
Index Workforce planning and analytics Org charts › Organimi vs Pingboard
Org charts and org design · September 2026 Edition

Organimi vs Pingboard

One of twelve models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; two named Pingboard. Both were named by all twelve models and Organimi carries 40 labels and Pingboard 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Organimi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Pingboard

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share17%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4027A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Organimi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lucidchart was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs Pingboard · Organimi vs OneDirectory

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OrganimiFirst choices, of twelve modelsPingboard
Direct12
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained703 against Pingboard
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Organimi · 1 against Pingboard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Organimi and Pingboard were named in the same answer fifty-nine times, of the 103 answers naming Organimi and the 96 naming Pingboard. In those answers Pingboard took the first choice four times and Organimi twenty.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Organimi and Pingboard stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Organimi Pingboard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Organimi on the left and Pingboard on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Organimi and Pingboard stood in it.

Organimi first, Pingboard not the choice

1 of 12 modelsPingboard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Organimi alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory

Pingboard first, Organimi an alternative

2 of 12 modelsOrganimi was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastLucidchart, Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarOneDirectory alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard
Mistral SmallOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
Llama 4 MaverickOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
Kimi K2OneDirectory alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard
MiniMax M2.5OneDirectory alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Organimi leads by twenty-two points.
Organimi31%#1 of 12
Pingboard10%#4 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Organimi leads by thirteen points.
Organimi17%#2 of 14
Pingboard4%#7 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Organimi leads by two points.
Organimi2%#7 of 13
Pingboard0%#10 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Organimi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Known for print/export problems (especially on larger orgs) and poor in-browser zoom/visibility.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi (4.3/5) has export/print glitches, poor customization (2/10 in tests), Safari issues” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi is suitable for organizations of all sizes, from mid-market businesses to global enterprises, making it a scalable solution that grows with your team.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For a startup (<25 employees): Use Organimi. It is the cleanest dedicated tool and costs nothing until you grow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Pingboard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Requires a custom quote; generally aimed at larger budgets.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“some users find it less intuitive for complex organizational structures and it may not scale well for very large enterprises” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“a starter plan that's cheaper than Pingboard's ($20 monthly vs $186.25 monthly)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Often rated best overall for mid-sized teams... Pingboard or Lucidchart are safe starts for most B2B mid-market needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (Workleap) offers the best value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (now part of Workleap) — Best for interactive org charts built around employee connection.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.