HR AI Index
Index Workforce planning and analytics Org charts › Organimi vs Miro
Org charts and org design · September 2026 Edition

Organimi vs Miro

One of twelve models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; zero named Miro. Both were named by all twelve models and Organimi carries 40 labels and Miro 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Organimi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Miro

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share17%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4025A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Organimi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lucidchart was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs Miro · Organimi vs OneDirectory

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OrganimiFirst choices, of twelve modelsMiro
Direct10
Paraphrase111 against Miro
Comparative00
Budget-constrained71
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Organimi · 4 against Miro
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Organimi and Miro were named in the same answer forty-four times, of the 103 answers naming Organimi and the 78 naming Miro. In those answers Miro took the first choice one time and Organimi fifteen.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Organimi and Miro stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Organimi Miro first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Organimi on the left and Miro on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Organimi and Miro stood in it.

Organimi first, Miro not the choice

1 of 12 modelsMiro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Organimi alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana
Grok 4.1 FastLucidchart, Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi
Mistral SmallOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
Llama 4 MaverickOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
Kimi K2OneDirectory alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard
MiniMax M2.5OneDirectory alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarOneDirectory alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Organimi leads by twenty-seven points.
Organimi31%#1 of 12
Miro4%#5 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Organimi leads by thirteen points.
Organimi17%#2 of 14
Miro4%#8 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Organimi leads by two points.
Organimi2%#7 of 13
Miro0%#13 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Organimi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Known for print/export problems (especially on larger orgs) and poor in-browser zoom/visibility.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi (4.3/5) has export/print glitches, poor customization (2/10 in tests), Safari issues” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi is suitable for organizations of all sizes, from mid-market businesses to global enterprises, making it a scalable solution that grows with your team.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For a startup (<25 employees): Use Organimi. It is the cleanest dedicated tool and costs nothing until you grow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Miro

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Miro, FigJam, or basic PowerPoint decks. * Why to avoid: While great for collaboration, these lack "governance features"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“manual diagramming tools that can produce org charts, but they do not provide strong native HR-to-org-chart automation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“more robust and data-driven than a simple static diagramming tool (like PowerPoint, Miro, or Lucidchart)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“My top pick for most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with Miro for visual org design + RACI” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For more affordable options, Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, and Visme are also recommended” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.