OneDirectory vs Miro
Five of twelve models named OneDirectory first on the direct prompt; zero named Miro. Both were named by all twelve models and OneDirectory carries 19 labels and Miro 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
OneDirectoryFirst choices, of twelve modelsMiro
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, OneDirectory and Miro were named in the same answer sixteen times, of the 46 answers naming OneDirectory and the 78 naming Miro. In those answers Miro took the first choice zero times and OneDirectory six.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
OneDirectory Miro first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OneDirectory on the left and Miro on the right.The direct prompt
OneDirectory first, Miro an alternative
5 of 12 modelsMiro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
OneDirectory12%#3 of 14Miro4%#8 of 14OneDirectory16%#2 of 13Miro0%#13 of 13What the models said about OneDirectory
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“OneDirectory is particularly well-suited for mid-size and large organizations with complex structures, holding a 4.9/5 rating on G2” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“OneDirectory stands out as the best org chart software for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with demos from top-rated (OneDirectory for M365 shops; OrgChart for HR planning)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Miro
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Miro, FigJam, or basic PowerPoint decks. * Why to avoid: While great for collaboration, these lack "governance features"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“manual diagramming tools that can produce org charts, but they do not provide strong native HR-to-org-chart automation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“more robust and data-driven than a simple static diagramming tool (like PowerPoint, Miro, or Lucidchart)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“My top pick for most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with Miro for visual org design + RACI” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For more affordable options, Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, and Visme are also recommended” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.