OneDirectory vs Pingboard
Five of twelve models named OneDirectory first on the direct prompt; two named Pingboard. Both were named by all twelve models and OneDirectory carries 19 labels and Pingboard 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
OneDirectoryFirst choices, of twelve modelsPingboard
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, OneDirectory and Pingboard were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 46 answers naming OneDirectory and the 96 naming Pingboard. In those answers Pingboard took the first choice two times and OneDirectory six.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
OneDirectory Pingboard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OneDirectory on the left and Pingboard on the right.The direct prompt
OneDirectory first, Pingboard an alternative
5 of 12 modelsPingboard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Pingboard first, OneDirectory an alternative
2 of 12 modelsOneDirectory was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Pingboard10%#4 of 12OneDirectory0%#– of 12OneDirectory12%#3 of 14Pingboard4%#7 of 14OneDirectory16%#2 of 13Pingboard0%#10 of 13What the models said about OneDirectory
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“OneDirectory is particularly well-suited for mid-size and large organizations with complex structures, holding a 4.9/5 rating on G2” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“OneDirectory stands out as the best org chart software for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with demos from top-rated (OneDirectory for M365 shops; OrgChart for HR planning)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Pingboard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Requires a custom quote; generally aimed at larger budgets.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“some users find it less intuitive for complex organizational structures and it may not scale well for very large enterprises” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“a starter plan that's cheaper than Pingboard's ($20 monthly vs $186.25 monthly)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Often rated best overall for mid-sized teams... Pingboard or Lucidchart are safe starts for most B2B mid-market needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (Workleap) offers the best value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (now part of Workleap) — Best for interactive org charts built around employee connection.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.