ChartHop vs Pingboard
Four of twelve models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; two named Pingboard. ChartHop was named by eleven of the twelve models and Pingboard by twelve and ChartHop carries 38 labels and Pingboard 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
ChartHopFirst choices, of twelve modelsPingboard
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, ChartHop and Pingboard were named in the same answer sixty-seven times, of the 341 answers naming ChartHop and the 96 naming Pingboard. In those answers Pingboard took the first choice four times and ChartHop seventeen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
ChartHop Pingboard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Pingboard on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.ChartHop first, Pingboard an alternative
3 of 12 modelsPingboard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Pingboard first, ChartHop an alternative
1 of 12 modelsChartHop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Pingboard10%#4 of 12ChartHop0%#12 of 12ChartHop27%#1 of 14Pingboard4%#7 of 14What the models said about ChartHop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget - ChartHop: ... requires a ~$9,000/year minimum commitment.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“minimum annual cost of around $9,000 and charges per employee, making it less suitable for smaller companies” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“The Specialized Standalones (Best for 500) Examples: ChartHop, Xenspace, Datasnapshots ... Verdict: Often the sweet spot for companies at your size.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Pingboard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Requires a custom quote; generally aimed at larger budgets.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“some users find it less intuitive for complex organizational structures and it may not scale well for very large enterprises” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“a starter plan that's cheaper than Pingboard's ($20 monthly vs $186.25 monthly)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Often rated best overall for mid-sized teams... Pingboard or Lucidchart are safe starts for most B2B mid-market needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (Workleap) offers the best value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (now part of Workleap) — Best for interactive org charts built around employee connection.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.