HR AI Index
Index Workforce planning and analytics Org charts › Pingboard vs Miro
Org charts and org design · September 2026 Edition

Pingboard vs Miro

Two of twelve models named Pingboard first on the direct prompt; zero named Miro. Both were named by all twelve models and Pingboard carries 27 labels and Miro 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Pingboard

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Miro

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate15%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2725A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Pingboard reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Organimi was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. ChartHop vs Pingboard · ChartHop vs Miro · Organimi vs Pingboard

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PingboardFirst choices, of twelve modelsMiro
Direct20
Paraphrase011 against Miro
Comparative00
Budget-constrained013 against Pingboard
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Pingboard · 4 against Miro
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Pingboard and Miro were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 96 answers naming Pingboard and the 78 naming Miro. In those answers Miro took the first choice zero times and Pingboard two.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Pingboard and Miro stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Pingboard Miro first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Pingboard on the left and Miro on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Pingboard and Miro stood in it.

Pingboard first, Miro not the choice

2 of 12 modelsMiro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastLucidchart, Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarOneDirectory alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard
Mistral SmallOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
Llama 4 MaverickOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard

Neither was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Organimi alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory
GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic
Kimi K2OneDirectory alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
MiniMax M2.5OneDirectory alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Pingboard leads by six points.
Pingboard10%#4 of 12
Miro4%#5 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Pingboard4%#7 of 14
Miro4%#8 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Pingboard0%#10 of 13
Miro0%#13 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Pingboard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Requires a custom quote; generally aimed at larger budgets.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“some users find it less intuitive for complex organizational structures and it may not scale well for very large enterprises” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“a starter plan that's cheaper than Pingboard's ($20 monthly vs $186.25 monthly)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Often rated best overall for mid-sized teams... Pingboard or Lucidchart are safe starts for most B2B mid-market needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (Workleap) offers the best value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (now part of Workleap) — Best for interactive org charts built around employee connection.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · alternative

What the models said about Miro

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Miro, FigJam, or basic PowerPoint decks. * Why to avoid: While great for collaboration, these lack "governance features"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“manual diagramming tools that can produce org charts, but they do not provide strong native HR-to-org-chart automation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“more robust and data-driven than a simple static diagramming tool (like PowerPoint, Miro, or Lucidchart)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“My top pick for most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with Miro for visual org design + RACI” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For more affordable options, Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, and Visme are also recommended” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.