draw.io vs Miro
Zero of twelve models named draw.io first on the direct prompt; zero named Miro. draw.io was named by ten of the twelve models and Miro by twelve and draw.io carries 15 labels and Miro 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
draw.ioFirst choices, of twelve modelsMiro
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, draw.io and Miro were named in the same answer nineteen times, of the 32 answers naming draw.io and the 78 naming Miro. In those answers Miro took the first choice one time and draw.io five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
draw.io Miro first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, draw.io on the left and Miro on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
draw.io4%#6 of 12Miro4%#5 of 12draw.io0%#– of 13Miro0%#13 of 13What the models said about draw.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid using general diagramming tools for org charts ... these lack org-specific layout automation. Creating messy connector routing in dense charts is a common problem.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools like draw.io, Google Drawings, Miro, and sometimes Creately are often described as manual diagramming tools ... they do not provide strong native HR-to-org-chart automation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“start with draw.io (free) or Canva (free tier) for basic needs” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with draw.io if you're comfortable building charts manually” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with draw.io—it's versatile, powerful, and zero cost/risk.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Miro
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Miro, FigJam, or basic PowerPoint decks. * Why to avoid: While great for collaboration, these lack "governance features"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“manual diagramming tools that can produce org charts, but they do not provide strong native HR-to-org-chart automation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“more robust and data-driven than a simple static diagramming tool (like PowerPoint, Miro, or Lucidchart)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“My top pick for most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with Miro for visual org design + RACI” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For more affordable options, Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, and Visme are also recommended” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.