AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Workforce planning and analytics › Org charts › Pingboard vs Creately
Org charts and org design · October 2026 Edition

Pingboard vs Creately

Four of fourteen models named Pingboard first on the direct prompt; zero named Creately. Pingboard was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Creately by twelve and Pingboard carries 36 labels and Creately 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Pingboard

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Creately

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share8%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%33%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3624A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Pingboard reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Organimi was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Pingboard · ChartHop vs Creately · Organimi vs Pingboard

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PingboardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCreately
Direct40
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against Creately
Budget-constrained041 against Pingboard
Scale-constrained001 against Creately
Negative002 against Pingboard · 6 against Creately
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Pingboard and Creately were named in the same answer thirty-three times, of the 97 answers naming Pingboard and the 84 naming Creately. In those answers Creately took the first choice two times and Pingboard two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Pingboard and Creately stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Pingboard Creately first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Pingboard on the left and Creately on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Pingboard and Creately stood in it.

Pingboard first, Creately not the choice

4 of 14 modelsCreately was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastPingboard alternatives: Lucidchart, Organimi
Mistral SmallOrgChartHub, Pingboard alternatives: Arbor, Ingentis org.manager, Organimi
Kimi K2Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Organimi
Muse Glimmer 30BPingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgChartHub, Organimi

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniChartHop alternatives: OrgChart, Pingboard
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Pingboard, The Org
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: BambooHR, Organimi, Pingboard
MiniMax M2.5ChartHop alternatives: OneDirectory, OrgChart, Pingboard, Sift

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarOrgChart alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashLuminal alternatives: BambooHR, BetterU, Lucidchart, Rippling
GPT-6 LunaOrganimi alternatives: ChartHop, OrgChart

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Pingboard leads by nine points.
Pingboard11%#4 of 15
Creately2%#7 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Pingboard8%#3 of 13
Creately8%#4 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Creately leads at enterprise.
Creately2%#10 of 15
Pingboard0%#11 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Pingboard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Avoid per-employee pricing models (like ChartHop or Pingboard) if you're budget-constrained” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Clunky org chart interface — users describe it as "a little hairy" with multiple team members” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious about: Pingboard (and similar mid-tier tools with manual quirks)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pingboard is frequently picked for growing and mid-size orgs that need governable org-chart changes with admin workflows and integrations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Pingboard if you want the best balance of automation, employee experience, and reasonable pricing” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (often rated best overall for mid-market)” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Creately

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Static diagramming tools such as Lucidchart, Miro, Creately, SmartDraw, Visio...” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“consider avoiding general-purpose diagramming tools like Lucidchart, Visio, SmartDraw, Miro, and Creately” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious about: General whiteboard/diagramming tools (Miro, Lucidchart, SmartDraw, Creately)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Creately ($5) gives the best bang for the buck, with unlimited diagrams and decent collaboration.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Draw.io for complete free access or Creately for a low-cost paid option are strong choices” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best org chart software is usually Creately or Organimi” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.